ViperOverLord wrote: Woodruff wrote: ViperOverLord wrote: Woodruff wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
So all of terrorism lies within that one act? That's is the sum total of terrorism in your view? THAT is some "weak sauce", though it would explain a lot.
Can you debate my points rather than twist them.
TWIST THEM? I didn't twist a damn thing! I stated that we've been sowing the seeds of terrorism for some time now, to which YOU responded with some crap about Afghanistan and 9/11, as if that's particularly relevant to my point. My response to that was to question why you'd even bring that irrelevance up. I didn't twist anything.
Just because you PRESUMED I was talking about something else doesn't mean you're right in thinking that. That you appear to believe terrorism against the United States started with 9/11 shows your ignorance.
ViperOverLord wrote:I will not be responding to you much longer if you insist on continually putting words in my mouth as a tactic to ignore what was just spoken.
I didn't put any words in your mouth. In fact, I directly quoted you. Sucks when someone's response doesn't fit into your preconceived ideas, doesn't it? Stop being a pathetic weasel and discuss the situation...or don't and get the hell out of the thread.
I also notice you didn't answer my question at the end...which answers it thoroughly.
Last edited by Woodruff
on Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.