Political Compass

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Political Compass

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:49 pm

http://www.politicalcompass.org

Where do you end up?

Me:
Economic Left/Right: -6.38 ['normal' left wing]
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.82 [extreme libertarian]

Make Gandi look like Maggie Thatcher ;)
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Jesse, Bad Boy on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:04 pm

Economic Left/Right: 8.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.74

However, I don't like Political Compass, as it is too vague, and sometimes says things that are ridiculous and misleading. For example:

"A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system."

While this is true, it does not ask for the test takers opinion. If I answer "No, it isn't", I would be ignoring the obvious in that a single party system cuts down all the arguments. On the other hand, if I answer "Yes, it is" it has become an endorsement of a one party state.

Another one:

"What is for the good of the transnational corporations is, ultimately, for the good of all."

This is a false dichotomy, not to mention a more in depth issue then it's presented as. For anarchists such as myself, corporations are viewed as tools of the state. However, the test does not distinguish between Corporations and transnational businesses, and if does, it does not relegate this important information to the test taker.

Again, another:

The businessperson and the manufacturer are more important than the writer and the artist.

This is a false dichotomy, because it insinuates that a writer or artist are not capable businesspeople. My stepmother is a writer, but she is a brilliant businessperson.

In short, Political Compass is too narrow, and for the most part, shit.
Image
User avatar
Cadet Jesse, Bad Boy
 
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:13 pm
Location: MY LIFE FOR LUE

Postby Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:20 pm

Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49

Not surprising, but I thought I'd have been more to the left than the libertarian aspect, I seem to be as left wing as Gandhi but less authoritarian :shock:

(Algy, you should get Mr Commons to take this test, but I can guess where he'd end up ;), you're a bit more libertarian than me, I guess that's the sheep thing :lol: )
Last edited by Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cook Kahless
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Belfast
Medals: 3
Tournament Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:22 pm

Jesse, Bad Boy wrote:"A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system."

It's basically a choice. You can either have democracy - which is a long, drawn out process ... OR you can have a single party state/dictator - which is potentially more flexible than democracy, but will be the opinion of the ruler rather than of the people.

There aren't any other options, really. It's basically asking if you agree with democracy or not - given that it's a far longer process than an autocracy.

The arguments are what makes a democracy a democracy! Personally I see a lack of arguments when debating (as the Conservative party have been doing recently in the UK :x) as a MAJOR disadvantage, because you can't find all of the faults in a policy if everyone goes along with it first time.


The businessperson and the manufacturer are more important than the writer and the artist.

This is a false dichotomy, because it insinuates that a writer or artist are not capable businesspeople. My stepmother is a writer, but she is a brilliant businessperson.

I think you've missed the point. It's a choice between function and form - ie is a machine more important than a work of art? Which is more important, doing or creating?



I think that a lot of the questions are very, very clever.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:23 pm

AlgyTaylor wrote: Personally I see a lack of arguments when debating (as the Conservative party have been doing recently in the UK :x)


Which one, Blairs or Camerons? :wink:
User avatar
Cook Kahless
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Belfast
Medals: 3
Tournament Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Postby Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:25 pm

Hitler just right of centre? What about his views on race and nationality? :?
User avatar
Cook Kahless
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Belfast
Medals: 3
Tournament Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:26 pm

Kahless wrote:(Algy, you should get Mr Commons to take this test, but I can guess where he'd end up ;))

:lol: 8)
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:28 pm

Kahless wrote:
AlgyTaylor wrote: Personally I see a lack of arguments when debating (as the Conservative party have been doing recently in the UK :x)


Which one, Blairs or Camerons? :wink:

:lol: Cameron is to Blair what Pepsi is to Coke. One can's red, one can's blue but they're practically the same thing.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:30 pm

The only good thing about Blair is that he f*cks with the tories minds, do they vote with their traditional values or to oppose the government :lol:
User avatar
Cook Kahless
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Belfast
Medals: 3
Tournament Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Postby unriggable on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:42 pm

Something like 4.5 bottom left on both sides. Pretty much in the middle of the bottom left corner.
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Medals: 4
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)

Postby Phobia on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:43 pm

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.33


wow, i never realised this before but im not strong in any direction! :lol:
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Phobia
 
Posts: 1497
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Sheffield, England
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)

Postby Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:45 pm

Middle of the road, phobia, watch out for oncoming traffic :)
User avatar
Cook Kahless
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Belfast
Medals: 3
Tournament Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Postby unriggable on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:46 pm

I never really have respect for any contraption that takes all your views and smashes them into a graph.
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Medals: 4
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)

Postby dcowboys055 on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:48 pm

aren't there like 10 of these threads
User avatar
Major dcowboys055
 
Posts: 2343
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:32 pm
Location: Milwaukee
Medals: 24
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1)

Postby Kahless on Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:50 pm

AlgyTaylor wrote:
Kahless wrote:
AlgyTaylor wrote: Personally I see a lack of arguments when debating (as the Conservative party have been doing recently in the UK :x)


Which one, Blairs or Camerons? :wink:

:lol: Cameron is to Blair what Pepsi is to Coke. One can's red, one can's blue but they're practically the same thing.


Except unlike Pepsi and Coke, they both get you pissed
User avatar
Cook Kahless
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Belfast
Medals: 3
Tournament Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Next

Return to Whose Forum is It Anyway?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Login