puppydog85 wrote:Oh, now I see why you have your knickers in a twist. I knocked the military's training.
No, you didn't. You didn't say anything at all about the military's training.
puppydog85 wrote:Well, whatever, he was a recent trainee and I have heard the standards have come down lately.
What does that even mean? Who is "he"...Martin?
puppydog85 wrote:But don't worry, name the time,place, and weapon and I will attempt to give satisfaction.
Are you sane? What does this have to do with anything?
puppydog85 wrote:But regrettably for your case, you never mentioned your training, you just descended from Sinai and told us what God had delivered to you.
You're new here, so you didn't know information that most of the commonly-posting posters here are aware of (that I'm former military). That's not your fault. But it's also not my fault that I didn't provide this commonly-aware information, because I believed those participating in the discussion already knew it. I was trying to save typing/information overload (which is a problem of mine as it is).
puppydog85 wrote:That coupled with the fact that your opinion was prima facia ignorant.
So you ARE saying that 23 years of military experience in hand-to-hand combat training is irrelevant to the subject? You need to make up your mind.
puppydog85 wrote:Anytime you want to interact with facts just respond to the ones I posted
What "facts" have you posted? Are those like Phatscotty's "fact" that Zimmerman had never punched Martin? I remember some anecdotal evidence you provided, that you apparently believe is far superior to military training.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.