Phatscotty wrote: Woodruff wrote: Phatscotty wrote: Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:You know Woodruff, you are welcome to present any facts to the contrary.
As opposed to your made up facts?
as opposed to anything
, dodge king! Put the F up
or STFU!!!!! Seriously Woodruff, it's time to put up or shut up.
I know irony is largely lost on you, Phatscotty...but before you can make that statement with any legitimacy, you've got about three years worth of putting up or shutting up to do. So have at it.
I already had it.
I provided a link to the autopsy. I put up. I brought the facts.
That doesn't show that it's a fact that Zimmerman didn't punch Martin.
Phatscotty wrote:But it seems like all you want to do is talk about me, and everything over the last 3 years, that is to say everything EXCEPT for the topic at hand.
Actually, it's been your incessant dodging of everything that goes against your misguided worldview that caused me to start paying more attention to exactly what it is that you say. In fact, I have quite often responded very directly to your points...and those posts have gone largely ignored. In fact, this is your modus operandi for not just my posts, but any that go against your worldview.
Phatscotty wrote:I have requested that you provide a shred of evidence 4 times now, and even other posters are starting to call you a coward for dodging so ungracefully.
Is that right? Because I'm not seeing these posts...perhaps I have them foed? Is that what you're suggesting?
Phatscotty wrote:You are unable to back up a single thing you said.
Really? What I have said is that your alleged "fact" is not at all a fact. It's simple for me to back that up...you haven't provided any proof of it.
Phatscotty wrote:What I have said has been backed up.
Perhaps you don't understand the term "fact". Facts aren't accomplished by supposition and presumption.
Phatscotty wrote:And another thing, if I have no legitimacy, and I am incorrect and ignorant and misinformed.
My use of the term referring to your legitimacy had nothing at all to do with whether you are ignorant or misinformed. Nothing at all. My use of the term had to do with "the pot calling the kettle black" in that you were demanding something of me which you have steadfastly refused to provide for yourself over oh so many years.
Phatscotty wrote:what in thee hell does that say about YOU, who spends countless hours responding to me? Do you really make sure to respond to every single thing a truly stupid person says?
I despise the ignorance that you try to spread.
Phatscotty wrote:Because most people don't. We ignore them because it isn't worth our time.
You ignore anything that goes against your worldview, so why not ignore that too?
Which is why I will ignore you, and I will bet a million dollars you will still continue stalking my posts, but you will only spend so much time doing that because I'm so dumb, right?
You've claimed to have foed me at least seven times now. Why doesn't it stick? You do seem to love the coward's way out.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.