Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
Haggis_McMutton wrote:conquerclub
> can't believe no one said that yet.


Funkyterrance wrote:Again, I don't like...humor, dark or otherwise.
jay_a2j wrote:lets not be so quick to judge Hitler
Woodruff wrote:DiM wrote:Woodruff wrote: much prefer games of the nature of Risk, Civilization, Chess...the one-move-at-a-time-and-now-it's-your-turn style. Though simultaneous moves are also great. But I don't care as much for real-time unless the strategy is just incredible.
have you tried crusader kings 2? it's extremely complex and awesome.
It doesn't ring a bell. I'll have to check it out. What sort of a "style" is it? The back of my mind is trying to tell me that it's similar to the Age of Empires series?DiM wrote:also any of the total war games are brilliant (assuming you actually take your time and fight all battles and don't autoresolve them)
I enjoyed Shogun Total War a great deal. I haven't played the other editions very much at all.
Woodruff wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:Woodruff wrote:The majority of my gametime is spent on Battle For Wesnoth (I'm telling you people, if you like strategy games...and I KNOW YOU DO...you gotta get this...it's free!).
Aside from that, I still hit up Zoo Tycoon, Neverwinter Nights, Blood Bowl and FIFA 09 (I don't like the later versions much, as their manager modes blow, and that's what I enjoy).
Strategy games, eh? Have you ever played any Fire Emblem games?
It does not ring any bells...any titles I should look up specifically?
I should point out that I HATE HATE HATE first-person-shooter style games. I much prefer games of the nature of Risk, Civilization, Chess...the one-move-at-a-time-and-now-it's-your-turn style. Though simultaneous moves are also great. But I don't care as much for real-time unless the strategy is just incredible.


greenoaks wrote:i am trying to play Civ 5 but Steam is giving me the shits

Funkyterrance wrote:Again, I don't like...humor, dark or otherwise.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Army of GOD wrote:greenoaks wrote:i am trying to play Civ 5 but Steam is giving me the shits
I feel like V was a downgrade from IV. I can't stand their decision to remove religion.
whitestazn88 wrote:slowly picking through skyrim, looking to get mass effect 3 soon, but i don't like to spend money on games when I only play like 2 hours a week. def gonna get the last of us though.
and hoping to get a new laptop/pc sometime in the next few months to play that diablo 3, but i don't want to spend money on a new rig when the one i've got right now is usable for everything i need aside from gaming.
Army of GOD wrote:greenoaks wrote:i am trying to play Civ 5 but Steam is giving me the shits
I feel like V was a downgrade from IV. I can't stand their decision to remove religion.
whitestazn88 wrote:looking to get mass effect 3 soon, but i don't like to spend money on games when I only play like 2 hours a week. def gonna get the last of us though.
DiM wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:looking to get mass effect 3 soon, but i don't like to spend money on games when I only play like 2 hours a week. def gonna get the last of us though.
don't bother with ME3. it's slightly better than ME2 but still nothing more than a mediocre game (at best).
it's so dumbed down it makes me sick. it's not an rpg it's not a 3rd person shooter. it's repetitive and frankly even the graphics kinda suck. all you do is use the same weapon throughout the game, you always shoot from cover because the level designers made sure you have a crate, a mound of debris, or something else. even advancing from A to B is actually a series of jumps from one cover place to another. a completely artificial feeling. oh and they ruined the illusive man.
Return to Whose Forum Is It, Anyway?
Users browsing this forum: chang50 and 3 guests