Phatscotty wrote: thegreekdog wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:I see what you are saying. I think he is Progressive and influenced by Marx because of what he stands for (what he says he stands for), ad based on his past, which included being directly tutored for years by Marxist Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, Reverand Wallace, his own words in his book "seeking out Marxist professors", the hand picked appointments of the straight up, self admitted Communists, admitted Maoists, admitted Marxists etc as Czars. I can only imagine what those Czars are doing, not like we will ever know much of the truth concerning them.
I'm going to have to be talked into changing my mind about this. Thanks for trying you made some good points. Just one question: if a Marxist got elected into a capitalist system, would the Marxist take advantage of Crony Capitalism?
That's a virtually impossible scenario. Marxists cannot get elected in our current system because no one would give them any campaign money.
What if they lied? Covered up their past? (hint) Obama did lie, and Obama has covered up his past. shhh don't tell anyone though!
I don't believe Barack Obama is a very bright man, but I think he's probably smart enough to realize that he's not covering anything up by printing it in a book that sold 2 million copies.Good places to hide secrets:
- on a piece of paper in a safe deposit box
- in a diary stored underneath one's mattress
- on encrypted USB drive secreted in the rectal cavity of a close friendBad places to hide secrets:
- chapter 1 of a New York Times bestseller
- the billboard on top of the Capitol Records Building overlooking the 101 freeway
- skywriting over Manhattan during Fleet Week
So far in this thread you haven't revealed anything that Obama's major corporate donors - donors who would have all of their properties nationalized in a Marxist-Leninist state - have free and open access to and have had for many years and yet they keep shoveling money down Obama's wide-open maw faster than Ben Bernake can print it.