Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Juan_Bottom wrote:State Budget Cuts Force West Texas Planned Parenthood Clinic To Close


Juan_Bottom wrote:That's what happens when you're born a woman.


Night Strike wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:State Budget Cuts Force West Texas Planned Parenthood Clinic To Close
That's what happens when you live off the government.

Evil Semp wrote:Night Strike wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:State Budget Cuts Force West Texas Planned Parenthood Clinic To Close
That's what happens when you live off the government.
I get the feeling that you think anyone who takes government assistance is "living off the government." I will agree that there are people who will gladly sit at home and be happy taking what the government will give them. However I feel many who are getting government assistance would love to be self sufficient. So I ask this question. How do you propose getting the people off government assistance? I am not asking about the one who are happy taking assistance just the ones who want to be self sufficient.


Night Strike wrote:You get people off government assistance by getting the government out of the way of the private sector which creates the jobs necessary for self-sufficiency.

Evil Semp wrote:Night Strike wrote:You get people off government assistance by getting the government out of the way of the private sector which creates the jobs necessary for self-sufficiency.
A lot of people who are on assistance now or on it because the private sector cut jobs. But I do notice one change in your position high lighted above. When have you become an advocate for jobs necessary for self-sufficiency?
So in the time it takes for government to move out of the way and the private sector to create those jobs of self-sufficiency what are the jobless supposed?
Evil Semp wrote:Night Strike wrote:You get people off government assistance by getting the government out of the way of the private sector which creates the jobs necessary for self-sufficiency.
A lot of people who are on assistance now or on it because the private sector cut jobs. But I do notice one change in your position high lighted above. When have you become an advocate for jobs necessary for self-sufficiency?
So in the time it takes for government to move out of the way and the private sector to create those jobs of self-sufficiency what are the jobless supposed?


Night Strike wrote:Evil Semp wrote:Night Strike wrote:You get people off government assistance by getting the government out of the way of the private sector which creates the jobs necessary for self-sufficiency.
A lot of people who are on assistance now or on it because the private sector cut jobs. But I do notice one change in your position high lighted above. When have you become an advocate for jobs necessary for self-sufficiency?
So in the time it takes for government to move out of the way and the private sector to create those jobs of self-sufficiency what are the jobless supposed?
I'm not a proponent of a "living wage" that Player is always crying for. People should get paid based on the talents they provide for the company. If people don't provide a talent to the company worth living off a single paycheck, then they're going to have to find a second job or a new job. It's not the company's job to pay them more out of pity.
And we have to wean people off government dependency. We have to cut back the 99 weeks of unemployment paychecks and start cutting back the amount of welfare distributed to people who are able to work yet aren't. It's not the government's job to provide a living to those who simply choose not to work, nor is it supposed to be a bailout to people who can't find work, beyond the unemployment money the companies had already contributed.

Return to One Does Not Simply Walk Into The Forums
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests