Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
Phatscotty wrote:Mitt Romney wins.
Not even close
Phatscotty wrote:Mitt Romney wins.
Not even close
Woodruff wrote:One of my cadets tweeted (twitted?) that she was bothered that religion was discussed during the debate.
This confuses me, as I don't remember religion being discussed. I only remember Romney mentioning briefly about keeping religious freedom intact. Which didn't bother me in the slightest.
Was religion actually discussed and I missed it?


Woodruff wrote:One of my cadets tweeted (twitted?) that she was bothered that religion was discussed during the debate.
This confuses me, as I don't remember religion being discussed. I only remember Romney mentioning briefly about keeping religious freedom intact. Which didn't bother me in the slightest.
Was religion actually discussed and I missed it?
muy_thaiguy wrote:Woodruff wrote:One of my cadets tweeted (twitted?) that she was bothered that religion was discussed during the debate.
This confuses me, as I don't remember religion being discussed. I only remember Romney mentioning briefly about keeping religious freedom intact. Which didn't bother me in the slightest.
Was religion actually discussed and I missed it?
Hell if I know, despite it being on right over the kitchen table, I have long since blocked out anything those two morons say whenever they come on TV (political ads or otherwise). My time is better spent stabbing my toes with toothpicks. That and my uncle and aunt out here would occasionally have an outburst at Obama about every other time he spoke. My uncle is private sector, but works with the naval airbase out here, so his job is directly connected to the military, so I can understand him being more than critical of someone who wants to downsize the military.
Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Mitt Romney wins.
Not even close
Agreed, but only because Obama was terrible and clearly not prepared. Romney did a great job getting ready for this.
In saying that, Romney really needs to start giving some specifics on his plans if he wants a chance in this. I'm really getting tired of the "budget will be balanced" mantra without any details.
Woodruff wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:Woodruff wrote:One of my cadets tweeted (twitted?) that she was bothered that religion was discussed during the debate.
This confuses me, as I don't remember religion being discussed. I only remember Romney mentioning briefly about keeping religious freedom intact. Which didn't bother me in the slightest.
Was religion actually discussed and I missed it?
Hell if I know, despite it being on right over the kitchen table, I have long since blocked out anything those two morons say whenever they come on TV (political ads or otherwise). My time is better spent stabbing my toes with toothpicks. That and my uncle and aunt out here would occasionally have an outburst at Obama about every other time he spoke. My uncle is private sector, but works with the naval airbase out here, so his job is directly connected to the military, so I can understand him being more than critical of someone who wants to downsize the military.
You oughta stay out there for Top Gun. It's quite a show. We used to take some of our cadets out there for it.
Woodruff wrote:I thought it was a good debate for both candidates, actually. I sort of felt sorry for the moderator. <grin>
Next time, let's get a couple of good candidates in there (<mumble>...Jill Stein...<grumble>...Gary Johnson).
Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Mitt Romney wins.
Not even close
Agreed, but only because Obama was terrible and clearly not prepared. Romney did a great job getting ready for this.
In saying that, Romney really needs to start giving some specifics on his plans if he wants a chance in this. I'm really getting tired of the "budget will be balanced" mantra without any details.
patrickaa317 wrote:Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Mitt Romney wins.
Not even close
Agreed, but only because Obama was terrible and clearly not prepared. Romney did a great job getting ready for this.
In saying that, Romney really needs to start giving some specifics on his plans if he wants a chance in this. I'm really getting tired of the "budget will be balanced" mantra without any details.
Pretty sure he said he'd cut Obamacare and stop funding PBS; combine government agencies and reduce public employment through attrition. Those are a few pieces in balancing the budget though there is still a lot more that needs to happen.

Phatscotty wrote:Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Mitt Romney wins.
Not even close
Agreed, but only because Obama was terrible and clearly not prepared. Romney did a great job getting ready for this.
In saying that, Romney really needs to start giving some specifics on his plans if he wants a chance in this. I'm really getting tired of the "budget will be balanced" mantra without any details.
Agreed also. I wish Romney would make the point that presidential candidates should not be making certain promises that will depend on an unknown future Congress's cooperation and legislation and how the executive and the legislative branch will work together.
Phatscotty wrote:I too want specifics, but I do not want to hear more empty promises that their position is not able to execute on it's own, or by executive order or signing statements alone...
Return to One Does Not Simply Walk Into The Forums
Users browsing this forum: Burndamage, Symmetry and 2 guests