Page 3 of 10

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:43 pm
by Symmetry
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:that is a lot more believable than when Ross Perot resigned his infamous presidential campaign because his daughter was abducted by aliens

Weirder things have happened....


Wait, what? <laughing> In all seriousness, I never heard about this. That is...awesome.


Phatscotty is a troll.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:48 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:that is a lot more believable than when Ross Perot resigned his infamous presidential campaign because his daughter was abducted by aliens

Weirder things have happened....


Wait, what? <laughing> In all seriousness, I never heard about this. That is...awesome.


Phatscotty is a troll.


It's f'n true ya stick!!!!! :lol: :lol:

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:49 pm
by Woodruff
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:that is a lot more believable than when Ross Perot resigned his infamous presidential campaign because his daughter was abducted by aliens

Weirder things have happened....


Wait, what? <laughing> In all seriousness, I never heard about this. That is...awesome.


Phatscotty is a troll.


I'm actually not doubting him on this one...it seems a bit "Perot-ish", to be honest. He was always a bit of an odd duck. I'd just never heard it.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:00 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry, just take a moment to yourself this time, and realize you stepped in it, and please learn to never doubt my word again.

My word is gold

Vote 4 Phatty!

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:10 pm
by Symmetry
Woodruff wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:that is a lot more believable than when Ross Perot resigned his infamous presidential campaign because his daughter was abducted by aliens

Weirder things have happened....


Wait, what? <laughing> In all seriousness, I never heard about this. That is...awesome.


Phatscotty is a troll.


I'm actually not doubting him on this one...it seems a bit "Perot-ish", to be honest. He was always a bit of an odd duck. I'd just never heard it.


I tried looking it up, to be fair, before I posted, maybe I got burned out on my sense of humour though.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:33 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:that is a lot more believable than when Ross Perot resigned his infamous presidential campaign because his daughter was abducted by aliens

Weirder things have happened....


Wait, what? <laughing> In all seriousness, I never heard about this. That is...awesome.


Phatscotty is a troll.


I'm actually not doubting him on this one...it seems a bit "Perot-ish", to be honest. He was always a bit of an odd duck. I'd just never heard it.


I tried looking it up, to be fair, before I posted, maybe I got burned out on my sense of humour though.


You are very lucky I am not a deusche, even though I know if it were me in your situation, you would probably have 3 threads dedicated to it named "Phatscotty proven wrong!!!!" and Woodruff would be sourcing this thread to every non-related post I made in the next 277 days....

It won't be a big deal though,if you take back calling me a troll....and then call yourself a troll :twisted:

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:36 pm
by Symmetry
You're still a troll, Scotty, that's never been in doubt.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:38 pm
by thegreekdog
Hey guys, get a room.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:40 pm
by Phatscotty
thegreekdog wrote:Hey guys, get a room.


TGD, almost forgot about you.

That post about Johnson, you really think he is doing everything he can?

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:41 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:You're still a troll, Scotty, that's never been in doubt.


you are precious...

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:46 pm
by Symmetry
Phatscotty wrote:
Symmetry wrote:You're still a troll, Scotty, that's never been in doubt.


you are precious...


Are you flirting with me?

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:47 pm
by Woodruff
Phatscotty wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:that is a lot more believable than when Ross Perot resigned his infamous presidential campaign because his daughter was abducted by aliens

Weirder things have happened....


Wait, what? <laughing> In all seriousness, I never heard about this. That is...awesome.


Phatscotty is a troll.


I'm actually not doubting him on this one...it seems a bit "Perot-ish", to be honest. He was always a bit of an odd duck. I'd just never heard it.


I tried looking it up, to be fair, before I posted, maybe I got burned out on my sense of humour though.


You are very lucky I am not a deusche, even though I know if it were me in your situation, you would probably have 3 threads dedicated to it named "Phatscotty proven wrong!!!!" and Woodruff would be sourcing this thread to every non-related post I made in the next 277 days....

It won't be a big deal though,if you take back calling me a troll....and then call yourself a troll :twisted:


Wouldn't it have been easier to post the source?

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:48 pm
by thegreekdog
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Hey guys, get a room.


TGD, almost forgot about you.

That post about Johnson, you really think he is doing everything he can?


Everything he can to do what exactly?

Let's say he pickets outside the debates. He won't get any press. Let's say he storms into the debates and gets arrested. He gets labelled a crazy nutjob and becomes even more irrelevant and possibly dangeous to Libertarians.

But seriously, you, Symm and Woodruff should just get a room.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:49 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Symmetry wrote:You're still a troll, Scotty, that's never been in doubt.


you are precious...


Are you flirting with me?


No, pretty much the opposite, but let's review your style.

.........So even when you admit you are flat out wrong, and that you were arrogant in your fault, you still won't take back the insult you hurled, when you admit the insult initiated from your own ignorance? And you think that aint trollin?

Good thing to know about you. I'm sure this will be a GREAT help in your future trying to get people to take you seriously

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:50 pm
by Symmetry
thegreekdog wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Hey guys, get a room.


TGD, almost forgot about you.

That post about Johnson, you really think he is doing everything he can?


Everything he can to do what exactly?

Let's say he pickets outside the debates. He won't get any press. Let's say he storms into the debates and gets arrested. He gets labelled a crazy nutjob and becomes even more irrelevant and possibly dangeous to Libertarians.

But seriously, you, Symm and Woodruff should just get a room.


As if you don't want to join in. Aren't we all on your most frustrating list? But you can't resist?

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:58 pm
by Phatscotty
thegreekdog wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Hey guys, get a room.


TGD, almost forgot about you.

That post about Johnson, you really think he is doing everything he can?


Everything he can to do what exactly?

Let's say he pickets outside the debates. He won't get any press. Let's say he storms into the debates and gets arrested. He gets labelled a crazy nutjob and becomes even more irrelevant and possibly dangeous to Libertarians.

But seriously, you, Symm and Woodruff should just get a room.


Woodruff is just going through the motions. I forget what you call people who constantly talk behind your back.....

anyways, if he did get arrested...idk. It would be pretty easy to get the impression that his speech was being stifled, it would get him a monster interview (free press), plus, this is America. Did people label Martin Luther King crazy for getting arrested for something he believed in so strongly he literally did put his life on the line? Do you not think we are in need of another major change, on a much larger scale, and we have a severe leadership deficit?

I know my rant is not the best idea possible, but if he doesn't do anything, then the only thing that will happen for sure is "nothing"

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:05 pm
by Symmetry
Gary Johnson ain't Martin Luther King by any stretch of the mind.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:06 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:Gary Johnson ain't Martin Luther King by any stretch of the mind.


.....because that was my point.....Gary Johnson = Martin Luther King....

:roll: :lol:

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:08 pm
by Symmetry
Phatscotty wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Gary Johnson ain't Martin Luther King by any stretch of the mind.


.....because that was my point.....Gary Johnson = Martin Luther King....

:roll: :lol:


Phatscotty is a troll.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:13 pm
by Phatscotty
anyways, back to the debate

Only one thing can be said about what happened to Obama last night
Image

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:23 pm
by john9blue
hey scotty, you can't show such enthusiastic support for both ron paul AND mitt romney.

choose one

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:24 pm
by Juan_Bottom
Nobunaga wrote:... Obama had his ass handed to him last night.

... It was seen by all during the debate that the President cannot win the argument based on facts, on policy, nor on anything else.... so what are they to do...? ... Now the strategy of the Dems is only too predictable.

... Convincing the public that Romney is full of shite is the first step. Then character assassination is the only answer.

... How long until we see commercials... "Romney lied when he said..."

... And how long before the dems pay off some whore to say Romney attacked her at a hotel? (or similar) While major media runs with the story 24/7 for weeks?

... It is just a matter of time. They are out of options. I would bet money on it.

... Predictable as hell. When you can't win the argument of ideas, you destroy your opponent through other means.

...


Are you crazz?
I don't know what Obama was doing, but everything Romney said was a lie, or falsehood, and I don't Romney can keep this up in the next debate. I doubt Obama will fail to pursue Romney's obvious lies the next time. I think he'll be better prepared.

Fact checkers:
http://factcheck.org/2012/10/dubious-de ... larations/

Image

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:48 am
by Nobunaga
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Nobunaga wrote:... Obama had his ass handed to him last night.

... It was seen by all during the debate that the President cannot win the argument based on facts, on policy, nor on anything else.... so what are they to do...? ... Now the strategy of the Dems is only too predictable.

... Convincing the public that Romney is full of shite is the first step. Then character assassination is the only answer.

... How long until we see commercials... "Romney lied when he said..."

... And how long before the dems pay off some whore to say Romney attacked her at a hotel? (or similar) While major media runs with the story 24/7 for weeks?

... It is just a matter of time. They are out of options. I would bet money on it.

... Predictable as hell. When you can't win the argument of ideas, you destroy your opponent through other means.

...


Are you crazz?
I don't know what Obama was doing, but everything Romney said was a lie, or falsehood, and I don't Romney can keep this up in the next debate. I doubt Obama will fail to pursue Romney's obvious lies the next time. I think he'll be better prepared.

Fact checkers:
http://factcheck.org/2012/10/dubious-de ... larations/



... Factcheck? Ohhhh, there's a solid, professional analysis. :roll:

... Show me something from a national financial magazine not owned by George Soros, or from the WSJ and I'll take you seriously.

... LIES! LIES! LIES! ... I so much enjoy being right.

...

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:41 am
by thegreekdog
Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Hey guys, get a room.


TGD, almost forgot about you.

That post about Johnson, you really think he is doing everything he can?


Everything he can to do what exactly?

Let's say he pickets outside the debates. He won't get any press. Let's say he storms into the debates and gets arrested. He gets labelled a crazy nutjob and becomes even more irrelevant and possibly dangeous to Libertarians.

But seriously, you, Symm and Woodruff should just get a room.


As if you don't want to join in. Aren't we all on your most frustrating list? But you can't resist?


I have no interest in joining a conversation to determine who is the biggest asshole/troll between the three of you. If Woodruff, PS, or you want to talk about the debate, then yes, I would like to join in that conversation.

Re: Debate!

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:44 am
by thegreekdog
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Hey guys, get a room.


TGD, almost forgot about you.

That post about Johnson, you really think he is doing everything he can?


Everything he can to do what exactly?

Let's say he pickets outside the debates. He won't get any press. Let's say he storms into the debates and gets arrested. He gets labelled a crazy nutjob and becomes even more irrelevant and possibly dangeous to Libertarians.

But seriously, you, Symm and Woodruff should just get a room.


Woodruff is just going through the motions. I forget what you call people who constantly talk behind your back.....

anyways, if he did get arrested...idk. It would be pretty easy to get the impression that his speech was being stifled, it would get him a monster interview (free press), plus, this is America. Did people label Martin Luther King crazy for getting arrested for something he believed in so strongly he literally did put his life on the line? Do you not think we are in need of another major change, on a much larger scale, and we have a severe leadership deficit?

I know my rant is not the best idea possible, but if he doesn't do anything, then the only thing that will happen for sure is "nothing"


It sounds like you've bought into the premise that a vote for Gary Johnson or any Libertarian is a wasted vote. I suppose if you were in a "battleground state" where one vote one way or another would sway the electoral college in that particular state, you'd have a good argument. But you have to wonder why the Repocrat machine doesn't want you to vote for a Libertarian when clearly your vote won't sway the election one way or the other, but may be enough to get a third party (who you supposedly like and agree with more than the Repocrats) some much-needed loot.