Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:
I am aware that I am not always perfectly clear at first, my apologies.
It appears that your view towards racists is that they are akin to some other species. A nut to be cracked, if you will. I am suggesting that if you continue to look at a racist as fundamentally different than you, you will never reach one with your "explanations".
Nah dog. I see two types of racists. One is a sort of casual racist. Uninformed. Operating on societal pressures and trends. Similar to the idea of rape culture in feminism. They don't know or otherwise can't recognize that their biases are degrading or harmful. These people are targets for education. For dialogue. For effort and hope. Their minds can be changed. This is the majority of people.
Then there are the other guys. They tend to be guys, actually. Dudes, often. You can explain the variety of genetic and cultural background that makes up African populations. To them, they're still black or African. You can write sourced essays expounding on the nature of heritability and culture, and how they relate to perception and bias. You post direct links to reputable science, and be met with blogs and YouTube videos. You can write treatises on the power of cooperation and color blindness and be chastised as an opponent of progress and empiricism. Eventually you get to the point where you have to disengage or risk sticking a pencil into your eye. Because, when it comes down to it, you're only helping their cause. Legitimizing it. By taking them seriously, they win. So, the options become 1)ignore them, and let them spew their vitriolic hatred, or 2) tell them not just "no," but "f*ck no!" "Intolerance will not be tolerated." They can spew their hate, and I will shower them with shame. That's all they really know anyway.
So, maybe I do view that class of cretin as inhuman. Maybe I'm just as bad as they are, judging them by their words and actions instead of by their color and nationality. Maybe there will be some crossover. Some collateral from the first group put off by me. But I trust in their rationality. They'll figure it out. But I cannot abide the second group poisoning the process. f*ck 'em.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
what has this forum become
thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
what has this forum become
Is there some phantom post by AoG showing some sort of statistical analysis proving that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
what has this forum become
Is there some phantom post by AoG showing some sort of statistical analysis proving that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
statistics isn't about proof, it's about probability and inference.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
what has this forum become
Is there some phantom post by AoG showing some sort of statistical analysis proving that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
statistics isn't about proof, it's about probability and inference.
Is there some phantom post by AoG shwing sort of statistical analysis showing the probability and inferring that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
You guys are slippery fucks, but I'll pin you down yet.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
what has this forum become
Is there some phantom post by AoG showing some sort of statistical analysis proving that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
statistics isn't about proof, it's about probability and inference.
Is there some phantom post by AoG shwing sort of statistical analysis showing the probability and inferring that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
You guys are slippery fucks, but I'll pin you down yet.
well i'd like to hear your explanation for the disproportionate amount of blacks in professional sports...
unless you are simply rejecting my explanation without providing one of your own, which would be very atheisty of you
Funkyterrance wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Army of GOD wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
ITT: AoG thinks that 76% of the NBA (or 342 of 450 players) consisting of black men means that the average black person is more athletic than the average white person.
oh, so NOW you understand my argument
You have to admit TGD, he's got his right to his opinion.
That blacks have bigger muscles than whites? On average?
No that he chooses to believe that the fact that the NBA is composed of 76% black people is enough evidence that the average black person is more athletic than the average white person. It has all other kinds of implications but it's not our problem.
john9blue wrote:thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:thegreekdog wrote:john9blue wrote:i read through the thread and the only other person who has a solid grasp of statistics is AOG
what has this forum become
Is there some phantom post by AoG showing some sort of statistical analysis proving that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
statistics isn't about proof, it's about probability and inference.
Is there some phantom post by AoG shwing sort of statistical analysis showing the probability and inferring that the average black-skinned person is more athletic than the average white-skinned person? If there is, can someone please show it to me.
You guys are slippery fucks, but I'll pin you down yet.
well i'd like to hear your explanation for the disproportionate amount of blacks in professional sports...
unless you are simply rejecting my explanation without providing one of your own, which would be very atheisty of you
Phatscotty wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Army of GOD wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
ITT: AoG thinks that 76% of the NBA (or 342 of 450 players) consisting of black men means that the average black person is more athletic than the average white person.
oh, so NOW you understand my argument
You have to admit TGD, he's got his right to his opinion.
That blacks have bigger muscles than whites? On average?
No that he chooses to believe that the fact that the NBA is composed of 76% black people is enough evidence that the average black person is more athletic than the average white person. It has all other kinds of implications but it's not our problem.
Hockey?
Funkyterrance wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Hockey?
Yeah well that one we can squash pretty quickly. Considering the cost difference between hockey gear and say.. a cheap basketball, one is exceedingly easier for a poor kid to get started on.
Timminz wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Hockey?
Yeah well that one we can squash pretty quickly. Considering the cost difference between hockey gear and say.. a cheap basketball, one is exceedingly easier for a poor kid to get started on.
And again, I will point you to soccer.
thegreekdog wrote:I explained it in a previous post. So did Player. So did FT.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users