Symmetry wrote:Difficult not to split hairs in a response to such a loaded question.
"Why do you hate Iranian cancer patients?"
Seriously?
How would you have responded?
I'm military, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on iranians
Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
Symmetry wrote:Difficult not to split hairs in a response to such a loaded question.
"Why do you hate Iranian cancer patients?"
Seriously?
How would you have responded?
BigBallinStalin wrote:What do you know?! You're some freakish raptor in a 18th century (?) outfit!!!
Symmetry wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:Symmetry wrote:
It was a quote from an article I posted, but no- not a quote from me.
splitting hairs there sym... careful not to make them asymmetric
Difficult not to split hairs in a response to such a loaded question.
"Why do you hate Iranian cancer patients?"
Seriously?
How would you have responded?
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
fadedpsychosis wrote:Symmetry wrote:Difficult not to split hairs in a response to such a loaded question.
"Why do you hate Iranian cancer patients?"
Seriously?
How would you have responded?
I'm military, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on iranians
BigBallinStalin wrote:So how does one deal with the unintended consequences of curbing Iran's ability to treat cancer patients?
Shall this be ignored? Shall the facts be disputed?
BigBallinStalin wrote:What do you know?! You're some freakish raptor in a 18th century (?) outfit!!!
fadedpsychosis wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:So how does one deal with the unintended consequences of curbing Iran's ability to treat cancer patients?
Shall this be ignored? Shall the facts be disputed?
are you saying uranium enrichment is the only way of getting cancer treatment in iran? what about other, non nuclear based treatment options? what about weapons grade enriched nuclear material? are you saying they need that too? wouldn't that be counter productive, considering weapons grade uranium is more likely to cause cancer that treat it?
fadedpsychosis wrote:are you saying uranium enrichment is the only way of getting cancer treatment in iran? what about other, non nuclear based treatment options?
fadedpsychosis wrote:what about weapons grade enriched nuclear material? are you saying they need that too?
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
BigBallinStalin wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:So how does one deal with the unintended consequences of curbing Iran's ability to treat cancer patients?
Shall this be ignored? Shall the facts be disputed?
are you saying uranium enrichment is the only way of getting cancer treatment in iran? what about other, non nuclear based treatment options? what about weapons grade enriched nuclear material? are you saying they need that too? wouldn't that be counter productive, considering weapons grade uranium is more likely to cause cancer that treat it?
Saxi posted some great rhetoric, which in my opinion seems worthy of being addressed; however, I have no idea how cancer treatment and enriching uranium are related.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What do you know?! You're some freakish raptor in a 18th century (?) outfit!!!
fadedpsychosis wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:So how does one deal with the unintended consequences of curbing Iran's ability to treat cancer patients?
Shall this be ignored? Shall the facts be disputed?
are you saying uranium enrichment is the only way of getting cancer treatment in iran? what about other, non nuclear based treatment options? what about weapons grade enriched nuclear material? are you saying they need that too? wouldn't that be counter productive, considering weapons grade uranium is more likely to cause cancer that treat it?
Saxi posted some great rhetoric, which in my opinion seems worthy of being addressed; however, I have no idea how cancer treatment and enriching uranium are related.
I have gone back and read it closer, and even though in research reactors you do typically see higher levels of enrichment the US at least has moved to change the fuel from HEU to LEU (higher to lower grade)... the US policy makers in this case may want iran to do the same process to the reactor in question rather than just give them high enriched uranium... but I'm not a policy maker and as I said earlier have no official opinion on this...
I state again however, that there are plenty of other treatment options available as well; see here for a decent list: http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Treatme ... ypes/index
as you'll see, radiation treatment is one of many options, and while a common one, is to my understanding actually less common than chemotherapy.
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
saxitoxin wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:So how does one deal with the unintended consequences of curbing Iran's ability to treat cancer patients?
Shall this be ignored? Shall the facts be disputed?
are you saying uranium enrichment is the only way of getting cancer treatment in iran? what about other, non nuclear based treatment options? what about weapons grade enriched nuclear material? are you saying they need that too? wouldn't that be counter productive, considering weapons grade uranium is more likely to cause cancer that treat it?
Saxi posted some great rhetoric, which in my opinion seems worthy of being addressed; however, I have no idea how cancer treatment and enriching uranium are related.
I have gone back and read it closer, and even though in research reactors you do typically see higher levels of enrichment the US at least has moved to change the fuel from HEU to LEU (higher to lower grade)... the US policy makers in this case may want iran to do the same process to the reactor in question rather than just give them high enriched uranium... but I'm not a policy maker and as I said earlier have no official opinion on this...
I state again however, that there are plenty of other treatment options available as well; see here for a decent list: http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Treatme ... ypes/index
as you'll see, radiation treatment is one of many options, and while a common one, is to my understanding actually less common than chemotherapy.
Again, if Germans, Israelis, Americans and Italians have the option of simple, non-invasive radiation therapy, it's not okay to say Iranians will have to make due with having their bodies cut open to remove small growths because they're just Iranian. It's not okay to say Iranians will have to deal with being blinded from thyroid eye disease because the west has decided they're not allowed to have radiation therapy in their country.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What do you know?! You're some freakish raptor in a 18th century (?) outfit!!!
fadedpsychosis wrote:they have plenty of alternatives to nuclear produced cures
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
Defense sources say Israel has received additional information that reinforces the IAEA's conclusion that Iran is using enriched uranium for medical purposes.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... m-1.468768
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
saxitoxin wrote:It's almost like I know the news before it happens (this is from a today-edition of a Zionist newspaper, BTW) ...Defense sources say Israel has received additional information that reinforces the IAEA's conclusion that Iran is using enriched uranium for medical purposes.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... m-1.468768
saxitoxin wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:they have plenty of alternatives to nuclear produced cures
Radiation therapy isn't just one in a smorgasbord of options cancer patients can choose from, a la carte style. It has specific uses for specific situations. Your policy would condemn Iranians to death or appalling alternatives (e.g. one alternate treatment for radiation therapy in dealing with eye cancer is to cut out the eye) for conditions that are easily treatable in the west.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What do you know?! You're some freakish raptor in a 18th century (?) outfit!!!
fadedpsychosis wrote:saxitoxin wrote:fadedpsychosis wrote:they have plenty of alternatives to nuclear produced cures
Radiation therapy isn't just one in a smorgasbord of options cancer patients can choose from, a la carte style. It has specific uses for specific situations. Your policy would condemn Iranians to death or appalling alternatives (e.g. one alternate treatment for radiation therapy in dealing with eye cancer is to cut out the eye) for conditions that are easily treatable in the west.
and the other options they have for getting access to the isotopes that don't involve weapons grade material? or are you going to conveniently ignore that because it doesn't fit into the fantasy you've built?
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
Return to One Does Not Simply Walk Into The Forums
Users browsing this forum: ooge, Phatscotty and 2 guests