Illegal

[Phatscotty]

what part of that is drawl?

[BigBallinStalin]

The Dept. of Customs and Immigration does NOT go around Boston rounding people up randomly and shipping them to other countries. This ISN'T happening... please don't suggest it does.

Them Canajuns is gettin all up in yer 'chusetts.

Please do modify my posts. No thanks.

I will please as I do with your posts. Thanks.

What in there thou layest from therein?

[PLAYER57832]

The point I was making was that you don't seem to believe there IS a problem with legal citizens having documents. For you to continue to hold the line that "everyone has documents".. and "they are not difficult to obtain" means you are intentionally ignorant.

Yep... "everyone" has them... or can get them without serious issues.

... yes I put "everyone" in quotes. Obviously there is some small fraction of the population that may have a hard time getting ID. Even if LIberals where right... and the percentage is higher than I believe... this WOULD NOT EFFECT legal immigrants. Legal immigrants BY DEFINITION have ID.

So you are under the impression that legal immigrants can vote?

[Timminz]

what part of that is drawl?

Those Bostonians: they sure know how to bastardize the English language.

[fadedpsychosis]

what part of that is drawl?

Those Bostonians: they sure know how to bastardize the English language.

unlike dem dere cannadians doncha noo...

[Timminz]

what part of that is drawl?

Those Bostonians: they sure know how to bastardize the English language.

unlike dem dere cannadians doncha noo...

Sarah Palin is not Canadian, thank god.

[rdsrds2120]

what part of that is drawl?

Those Bostonians: they sure know how to bastardize the English language.

unlike dem dere cannadians doncha noo...

Parah Salin is not Canadian, thank god.

BMO

[fadedpsychosis]

what part of that is drawl?

Those Bostonians: they sure know how to bastardize the English language.

unlike dem dere cannadians doncha noo...

Sarah Palin is not Canadian, thank god.

*L* wish my country could disown her too...

[Symmetry]

I seem to have made a few people angry by bringing this up. There are replies in thread for people who don't go along with the idea.

What idea?

You don't seem to have one.

Says the dude with a family guy avatar.

[jimboston]

The point I was making was that you don't seem to believe there IS a problem with legal citizens having documents. For you to continue to hold the line that "everyone has documents".. and "they are not difficult to obtain" means you are intentionally ignorant.

Yep... "everyone" has them... or can get them without serious issues.

... yes I put "everyone" in quotes. Obviously there is some small fraction of the population that may have a hard time getting ID. Even if LIberals where right... and the percentage is higher than I believe... this WOULD NOT EFFECT legal immigrants. Legal immigrants BY DEFINITION have ID.

So you are under the impression that legal immigrants can vote?

No.

We talking about how hard it is for someone here legally to have ID or not.

Please take off your stupid hat.

(Oh you can't it's permanently attached to your head.)

[jimboston]

I seem to have made a few people angry by bringing this up. There are replies in thread for people who don't go along with the idea.

What idea?

You don't seem to have one.

Says the dude with a family guy avatar.

Ad Hominem in Action!

Don't bother trying to clarify your point or anything... just attack me.
Reported to MOD.. personal attack.

[Symmetry]

I seem to have made a few people angry by bringing this up. There are replies in thread for people who don't go along with the idea.

What idea?

You don't seem to have one.

Says the dude with a family guy avatar.

Ad Hominem in Action!

Don't bother trying to clarify your point or anything... just attack me.
Reported to MOD.. personal attack.

Good luck with that.

[jimboston]

I seem to have made a few people angry by bringing this up. There are replies in thread for people who don't go along with the idea.

What idea?

You don't seem to have one.

Says the dude with a family guy avatar.

Ad Hominem in Action!

Don't bother trying to clarify your point or anything... just attack me.
Reported to MOD.. personal attack.

Good luck with that.

Again not a reply with any content.

So you agree your previous post was the definition of an Ad Hominem attack on my person?

[Symmetry]

I seem to have made a few people angry by bringing this up. There are replies in thread for people who don't go along with the idea.

What idea?

You don't seem to have one.

Says the dude with a family guy avatar.

Ad Hominem in Action!

Don't bother trying to clarify your point or anything... just attack me.
Reported to MOD.. personal attack.

Good luck with that.

Again not a reply with any content.

So you agree your previous post was the definition of an Ad Hominem attack on my person?

No, both as a poster and as a fan of dictionaries.

[jimboston]

No, both as a poster and as a fan of dictionaries.

You're soooooo smart. I wish I could be smart like you.

Of course, it'd be funny if your insult was actually on target or accurate in some way. Since it's not...

[Symmetry]

No, both as a poster and as a fan of dictionaries.

You're soooooo smart. I wish I could be smart like you.

Of course, it'd be funny if your insult was actually on target or accurate in some way. Since it's not...

I guess we'll both have to deal with you being the best you you can be.

[thegreekdog]

Yeah, I guess a large part of the thread has come to be about the peculiar use of Americans to say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence pre-trial.

The thread is was it is I suppose.

Okay. Weird reason for a thread, but okay.

[Symmetry]

Yeah, I guess a large part of the thread has come to be about the peculiar use of Americans to say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence pre-trial.

The thread is was it is I suppose.

Okay. Weird reason for a thread, but okay.

Presumption of innocence is weird?

[BigBallinStalin]

Let's try to revitalize this thread.

Symmetry, how do you think illegals in the US are detained and tried, Sym? Describe that process.

[thegreekdog]

Yeah, I guess a large part of the thread has come to be about the peculiar use of Americans to say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence pre-trial.

The thread is was it is I suppose.

Okay. Weird reason for a thread, but okay.

Presumption of innocence is weird?

No, presumption of innocence is good. I'm not following your logic of going from "weird reason for a thread" to "presumption of innocence is weird."

Do you have any evidence or other background for your assertion that Americans say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence?

Do you understand the American criminal justice system at all (not just the immigration system, anything)?

[Symmetry]

Yeah, I guess a large part of the thread has come to be about the peculiar use of Americans to say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence pre-trial.

The thread is was it is I suppose.

Okay. Weird reason for a thread, but okay.

Presumption of innocence is weird?

No, presumption of innocence is good. I'm not following your logic of going from "weird reason for a thread" to "presumption of innocence is weird."

Do you have any evidence or other background for your assertion that Americans say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence?

Do you understand the American criminal justice system at all (not just the immigration system, anything)?

I would be surprised if they don't. I'm not sure I'd be quite as annoyed at someone pointing out that it's incorrect, and that presumption of innocence is important.

[thegreekdog]

Yeah, I guess a large part of the thread has come to be about the peculiar use of Americans to say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence pre-trial.

The thread is was it is I suppose.

Okay. Weird reason for a thread, but okay.

Presumption of innocence is weird?

No, presumption of innocence is good. I'm not following your logic of going from "weird reason for a thread" to "presumption of innocence is weird."

Do you have any evidence or other background for your assertion that Americans say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence?

Do you understand the American criminal justice system at all (not just the immigration system, anything)?

I would be surprised if they don't. I'm not sure I'd be quite as annoyed at someone pointing out that it's incorrect, and that presumption of innocence is important.

You'd be surprised if they don't? Ha... okay.

I'm not annoyed, I'm just confused.

[Symmetry]

Do you have any evidence or other background for your assertion that Americans say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence?

I would be surprised if they don't. I'm not sure I'd be quite as annoyed at someone pointing out that it's incorrect, and that presumption of innocence is important.

You'd be surprised if they don't? Ha... okay.

I'm not annoyed, I'm just confused.

Edited.

[thegreekdog]

Do you have any evidence or other background for your assertion that Americans say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence?

I would be surprised if they don't. I'm not sure I'd be quite as annoyed at someone pointing out that it's incorrect, and that presumption of innocence is important.

You'd be surprised if they don't? Ha... okay.

I'm not annoyed, I'm just confused.

Edited.

I'm even more confused. I'm going to report you for trolling.

[Symmetry]

Do you have any evidence or other background for your assertion that Americans say someone is illegal without the presumption of innocence?

I would be surprised if they don't. I'm not sure I'd be quite as annoyed at someone pointing out that it's incorrect, and that presumption of innocence is important.

You'd be surprised if they don't? Ha... okay.

I'm not annoyed, I'm just confused.

Edited.

I'm even more confused. I'm going to report you for trolling.

Good luck with that.