tzor wrote:Woodruff wrote:So then you're pursuing Bush as well? Or is this just a partisan thing?
Bush was only continuing the line started by Clinton.
So it's just a partisan thing, as I suspected. Thanks.
Moderator: Community Team
tzor wrote:Woodruff wrote:So then you're pursuing Bush as well? Or is this just a partisan thing?
Bush was only continuing the line started by Clinton.
Woodruff wrote:So it's just a partisan thing, as I suspected. Thanks.
Nobunaga wrote:...
... For all the attention this is getting from major media, it's like Woodward and Bernstein helping Nixon cover up Watergate.
...
tzor wrote:Woodruff wrote:So it's just a partisan thing, as I suspected. Thanks.
I can't help it if you continue to wear those red colored glasses
tzor wrote:There is no solid evidence to suggest that Bush knew for a fact that there were not weapons out there.
There is solid evidence to suggest that everyone in a bipartisan manner bought into the flimsy evidence as being rock hard solid when it was simply not true.
President Clinton used that same flimsy evidence to conduct military strikes in Iran in 1998. He no more "lied" than Bush.
Yes, Bush also had alterior motives for going to war with Iraq, and these were clearly not good, but we are specifically talking about "lies."
And it still doesn't compare to the Spanish American War *you remember the Maine right*
McKinley, although forced reluctantly by congress to go into war was ... wait for it ... a Republican.
Woodruff wrote:It's not red-colored glasses if I recognize that you pursue one individual for something but not another individual who did the same thing. It's just my recognition that you're a partisan hack.
tzor wrote:Woodruff wrote:It's not red-colored glasses if I recognize that you pursue one individual for something but not another individual who did the same thing. It's just my recognition that you're a partisan hack.
It is YOU that insist that they are the same thing. They are not the same thing. You are wrong.
Whether or not I am occasionally partisan is besides the point that they are not the same thing.
You must leave the emotional baggage behind you if you are to fully accept logic.
Woodruff wrote:A continued policy is a continued policy. I'd suggest you follow your own advice.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users