But as the spreadsheet shows, the larger the precinct, the numbers start to change dramatically.
“If percentages did not change from one precinct to the next, we would see a flat line, but what we are seeing is sloped lines downward for Democrats and upward for Republicans (or, in the case of the Presidential primary, upward for Romney and downward for his opponents), said Duniho.”
In every election contest, the trend lines dramatically crossed for no apparent reason. It was revealed that votes were being systemically bled off for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul and then being credited to Mitt Romney.
So, the trend lines crossed? Therefore, assume only fraud happened? There's no other explanation? (More votes for Romney were counted at that time because... FRAUD! or because people actually voted for Romney...?).
Did all the trend lines cross at the same time? (That would be suspicious, but it doesn't say).
He looked at every 2010 race in Arizona from Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. The trends lines all did the exact same thing. Someone had manipulated the election outcome, most likely one person inserting a programme inside the system’s central computer… that flipped votes.
Okay... the trends lines all did the exact same thing... what exactly did they do? Or were they a reflection of votes--as they actually were (i.e. not fraud).
Furthermore, what are the chances of this observation being an anomaly?
How do other past elections and their trend lines appear?