Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..

Vartiovuori wrote:I think birth control in the form of pills is too specific to be called a right. I do believe that access to effective form of birth control* should be a right, however.
*Abstinence doesn't count.

greenoaks wrote:Falcon Punches are cheaper and universally available

AndyDufresne wrote:Do you mean access to birth control pills, or the very idea that there is such a thing as birth control pills in existence?
--Andy

saxitoxin wrote:Purely IMO, I would consider it an extension of the right of bodily integrity. As such, I would think it's probably a negative right (i.e. the government can't try to foil your attempts to get a French Tickler) but, IMO, not a positive right (i.e. the government is obliged to give you a French Tickler).
2dimes wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Purely IMO, I would consider it an extension of the right of bodily integrity. As such, I would think it's probably a negative right (i.e. the government can't try to foil your attempts to get a French Tickler) but, IMO, not a positive right (i.e. the government is obliged to give you a French Tickler).
This is my position though I don't mind that the free clinics here hand out birth control. Isn't harming me any since they have the budget.
Return to One Does Not Simply Walk Into The Forums
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests