Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..

Vartiovuori wrote:I think birth control in the form of pills is too specific to be called a right. I do believe that access to effective form of birth control* should be a right, however.
*Abstinence doesn't count.

greenoaks wrote:Falcon Punches are cheaper and universally available

AndyDufresne wrote:Do you mean access to birth control pills, or the very idea that there is such a thing as birth control pills in existence?
--Andy
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
saxitoxin wrote:Purely IMO, I would consider it an extension of the right of bodily integrity. As such, I would think it's probably a negative right (i.e. the government can't try to foil your attempts to get a French Tickler) but, IMO, not a positive right (i.e. the government is obliged to give you a French Tickler).
2dimes wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Purely IMO, I would consider it an extension of the right of bodily integrity. As such, I would think it's probably a negative right (i.e. the government can't try to foil your attempts to get a French Tickler) but, IMO, not a positive right (i.e. the government is obliged to give you a French Tickler).
This is my position though I don't mind that the free clinics here hand out birth control. Isn't harming me any since they have the budget.
2dimes wrote:the free clinics here hand out birth control
FunkyTerrance wrote: Ok, I've got to ask. Who is that in your avi? Johnny Carson?
Return to One Does Not Simply Walk Into The Forums
Users browsing this forum: AndyDufresne, crispybits, gregwolf121, Symmetry, thegreekdog and 2 guests