Gta 5

[ManBungalow]

left right L1 L2 R1 R2 up down left right

[xeno]

San Andreas is my (And alot of others) favorite, however from an online play perspective(Which is huge for me) Gta 4 was revolutionary in that respect. You can free mode online with like 16 people or something, that is just crazy awesome.

That was the only real improvement. It was gta though! Online play doesn't matter!


Also red dead was boring as f*ck. Couldn't finish the game

[CBlake]

San Andreas is my (And alot of others) favorite, however from an online play perspective(Which is huge for me) Gta 4 was revolutionary in that respect. You can free mode online with like 16 people or something, that is just crazy awesome.

That was the only real improvement. It was gta though! Online play doesn't matter!


Also red dead was boring as f*ck. Couldn't finish the game

WATTT!!!!1111 Online play matters to me, especially when I can get in police chases with my friends in the car with me online, so tight.

[xeno]

San Andreas is my (And alot of others) favorite, however from an online play perspective(Which is huge for me) Gta 4 was revolutionary in that respect. You can free mode online with like 16 people or something, that is just crazy awesome.

That was the only real improvement. It was gta though! Online play doesn't matter!


Also red dead was boring as f*ck. Couldn't finish the game

WATTT!!!!1111 Online play matters to me, especially when I can get in police chases with my friends in the car with me online, so tight.

And it's people like you that are killing single player mode in every game genre

[Haggis_McMutton]

Why is it called GTA 5? Shouldn't it be like GTA 23 or something? DO NUMBERS NOT MATTER ANYMORE ?!?!

Also, the original was clearly the best.

[AndyDufresne]

Why is it called GTA 5? Shouldn't it be like GTA 23 or something? DO NUMBERS NOT MATTER ANYMORE ?!?!

Also, the original was clearly the best.

I anged that.


--Andy

[tkr4lf]

I don't get all the hate for 4. Yeah, it was a step down in most areas from SA, but it improved other areas. Plus I actually enjoyed the story. And the internet? Really? Did you guys actually read any of the websites? That stuff was hilarious. The TV shows? Hilarious. Pißwasser? Hilarious.

I'm sure 5 will be just as good. I like that they're returning to San Andreas, or at least Los Santos and the surrounding area. That should be fun. And if they make it to where you can fly planes again, it will be damn near just as good as SA, in my opinion.

I do miss being able to customize your character, but whatevs, I play RPG's too, so I get my fix for that kind of gameplay elsewhere.


As for the retarded online gameplay and the adherents of that, I completely agree, you guys are ruining single-player gameplay. Developers are wasting time and money developing that crap instead of focusing on the single-player game, like they should be.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Vice City was fun. Never played San Andreas. 4 was okay, but I thought the driving was ridiculous. The upkeep of relations with your contacts was annoying, too.

-TG

[nagerous]

4 was fun purely for getting Niko drunk

Romaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!

[CBlake]

I don't get all the hate for 4. Yeah, it was a step down in most areas from SA, but it improved other areas. Plus I actually enjoyed the story. And the internet? Really? Did you guys actually read any of the websites? That stuff was hilarious. The TV shows? Hilarious. Pißwasser? Hilarious.

I'm sure 5 will be just as good. I like that they're returning to San Andreas, or at least Los Santos and the surrounding area. That should be fun. And if they make it to where you can fly planes again, it will be damn near just as good as SA, in my opinion.

I do miss being able to customize your character, but whatevs, I play RPG's too, so I get my fix for that kind of gameplay elsewhere.


As for the retarded online gameplay and the adherents of that, I completely agree, you guys are ruining single-player gameplay. Developers are wasting time and money developing that crap instead of focusing on the single-player game, like they should be.

Lol you guys are dumb, I open the box and beat the shit out of the story mode, then I play free roam (Which you do alone) with my friends, I can see how I am ruining the game

[Army of GOD]

I guess my biggest problems for 4 are: (1) realistic driving. I don't fucking want realistic driving. Half of the fun of San Andreas/Vice City was the exquisitely fantastical driving. I love doing 100mph and then pulling a fishtail 180 out of my ass. (2) the setting. I mean...for some reason I wasn't a huge fan of Liberty City in 4. I loved it in GTA 3...but 4 seemed too bland. San Andreas allowed for much more variation, which I hope they touch in GTA 5.

[xeno]

I guess my biggest problems for 4 are: (1) realistic driving. I don't fucking want realistic driving. Half of the fun of San Andreas/Vice City was the exquisitely fantastical driving. I love doing 100mph and then pulling a fishtail 180 out of my ass. (2) the setting. I mean...for some reason I wasn't a huge fan of Liberty City in 4. I loved it in GTA 3...but 4 seemed too bland. San Andreas allowed for much more variation, which I hope they touch in GTA 5.

Driving did take a step back come to think of it! I could still drive around bone county listening to freebird on kdust. Such a good soundtrack from top to bottom. The story was bad in 4 btw. I couldn't finish it.

[tkr4lf]

I guess my biggest problems for 4 are: (1) realistic driving. I don't fucking want realistic driving. Half of the fun of San Andreas/Vice City was the exquisitely fantastical driving. I love doing 100mph and then pulling a fishtail 180 out of my ass. (2) the setting. I mean...for some reason I wasn't a huge fan of Liberty City in 4. I loved it in GTA 3...but 4 seemed too bland. San Andreas allowed for much more variation, which I hope they touch in GTA 5.

Driving did take a step back come to think of it! I could still drive around bone county listening to freebird on kdust. Such a good soundtrack from top to bottom. The story was bad in 4 btw. I couldn't finish it.

Fair enough. The driving was more realistic, which was a bit less fun. The setting, well, I guess that's just a preference thing. I mean, don't get me wrong, I loved the setting for SA, but I also loved the setting for 4. I like that they made it more like New York City in 4.

Either way, they're both great games. SA still is king, though. There's nothing like flying that military jet around shooting missiles at random cars, then going as high as you possibly can and parachuting out into Las Venturas to go bet $500,000 on a single roulette spin.

And yeah, the soundtrack for SA was the best. I don't think they'll ever beat that.

Anyway, looking forward to 5. I'm sure it will be good. Hopefully they go back to Vice City in the next one. It would be cool to revisit that setting with it being updated the way the other settings have been/ are being done.

Lol you guys are dumb, I open the box and beat the shit out of the story mode, then I play free roam (Which you do alone) with my friends, I can see how I am ruining the game

It's not that you personally are ruining the single-player game.

It's the fact that there are players out there that prefer and want multi-player aspects, which forces developers to devote time that could otherwise be spent making the single-player experience even better. It's a waste of developer time and money that could be much better used.

Take GTA:IV for example. Many people have a problem with some aspects of the single player game. Now imagine that there was no multi-player and all the time and money spent developing that was instead put into the single-player game. I would imagine that it would be twice as good as it is now. More features, more story, possibly more DLC, etc. Instead that manpower was put into the multi-player experience.

I guess I don't get the drive for multi-player. Since when was gaming all about multi-player? If you want to do stuff with friends, go do stuff with friends. If you want to play a video game, then sit in your room and play a video game. Why do those two activities have to be combined?

Personally I value my alone time spent playing video games. I enjoy hanging out with my friends, but often times I want to escape from other people. That's what video games are great for. Anyway...enough about that.

[Army of GOD]

I'm hoping that 5 will be not only the best-looking GTA but the most massive and most diverse...pretty much SA 2.0.

Also, even though a lot of the GTAs have been "be a mercenary for other gangs", I loved SA's "be a motherfucking gang member". GROVE STREET 4 LYFE

[CBlake]

I guess my biggest problems for 4 are: (1) realistic driving. I don't fucking want realistic driving. Half of the fun of San Andreas/Vice City was the exquisitely fantastical driving. I love doing 100mph and then pulling a fishtail 180 out of my ass. (2) the setting. I mean...for some reason I wasn't a huge fan of Liberty City in 4. I loved it in GTA 3...but 4 seemed too bland. San Andreas allowed for much more variation, which I hope they touch in GTA 5.

Driving did take a step back come to think of it! I could still drive around bone county listening to freebird on kdust. Such a good soundtrack from top to bottom. The story was bad in 4 btw. I couldn't finish it.

Fair enough. The driving was more realistic, which was a bit less fun. The setting, well, I guess that's just a preference thing. I mean, don't get me wrong, I loved the setting for SA, but I also loved the setting for 4. I like that they made it more like New York City in 4.

Either way, they're both great games. SA still is king, though. There's nothing like flying that military jet around shooting missiles at random cars, then going as high as you possibly can and parachuting out into Las Venturas to go bet $500,000 on a single roulette spin.

And yeah, the soundtrack for SA was the best. I don't think they'll ever beat that.

Anyway, looking forward to 5. I'm sure it will be good. Hopefully they go back to Vice City in the next one. It would be cool to revisit that setting with it being updated the way the other settings have been/ are being done.

Lol you guys are dumb, I open the box and beat the shit out of the story mode, then I play free roam (Which you do alone) with my friends, I can see how I am ruining the game

It's not that you personally are ruining the single-player game.

It's the fact that there are players out there that prefer and want multi-player aspects, which forces developers to devote time that could otherwise be spent making the single-player experience even better. It's a waste of developer time and money that could be much better used.

Take GTA:IV for example. Many people have a problem with some aspects of the single player game. Now imagine that there was no multi-player and all the time and money spent developing that was instead put into the single-player game. I would imagine that it would be twice as good as it is now. More features, more story, possibly more DLC, etc. Instead that manpower was put into the multi-player experience.

I guess I don't get the drive for multi-player. Since when was gaming all about multi-player? If you want to do stuff with friends, go do stuff with friends. If you want to play a video game, then sit in your room and play a video game. Why do those two activities have to be combined?

Personally I value my alone time spent playing video games. I enjoy hanging out with my friends, but often times I want to escape from other people. That's what video games are great for. Anyway...enough about that.

Its actually money well spent and their sales are much higher because the online community for this game is high. It would make no since to devote no time to multiplayer because their sales would plummet. Honestly how many games today don't have some kind of multiplayer? The answer is not many, that is what people want and the game developers have to adapt to that. This isn't 2004 anymore.