Symmetry wrote:john9blue wrote:hey sym, do you think it's even POSSIBLE for two people that the state recognizes as master and slave to have a mutually consenting sexual relationship?
No, I think that the very nature of slavery rules out the idea of mutual consent when it comes to a master and his slave.
do you think it's possible for an employee to do the same with their boss? even if the boss is extremely demanding because they know the employee badly needs the job?
Symmetry wrote:Now, will you answer my my question about how you define rape?
sure, rape is sexual activity without the consent of both parties.
that definition, like all definitions, is subjective. you know this all too well, and i'm not interesting in dealing with your bullshit morphing of the english language to get words to mean what you think they should mean.
maybe once you realize that the world and the english language aren't black and white, then we can have a meaningful talk.