Conquer Club

Woodruff wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:PS nice to see you back Woodruff.

Thanks, but I suspect it's not going to last long. I can only tolerate indiscriminate intolerance for so long, and that level is getting lower and lower the older I get.

Do what I do and channel ur rage into trolling, rather than outright abuse. Whenever PS really riles me up I just go down tangent alley in the troll forest. Probably still bannable, but most people round here are pretty hesitant to click the ole report button.

Strolling subtly through Troll Forest leaves few tracks.

Woodruff wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:PS nice to see you back Woodruff.

Thanks, but I suspect it's not going to last long. I can only tolerate indiscriminate intolerance for so long, and that level is getting lower and lower the older I get.

if you can't beat 'em, join 'em, amirite?

john9blue wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:PS nice to see you back Woodruff.

Thanks, but I suspect it's not going to last long. I can only tolerate indiscriminate intolerance for so long, and that level is getting lower and lower the older I get.

if you can't beat 'em, join 'em, amirite?

Ah yes, Mr Moderate...as soon as you can point my indiscriminate intolerance, then we'll be good to continue the conversation.

Woodruff wrote:

john9blue wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:PS nice to see you back Woodruff.

Thanks, but I suspect it's not going to last long. I can only tolerate indiscriminate intolerance for so long, and that level is getting lower and lower the older I get.

if you can't beat 'em, join 'em, amirite?

Ah yes, Mr Moderate...as soon as you can point my indiscriminate intolerance, then we'll be good to continue the conversation.

you just said that you were unable to tolerate indiscriminate intolerance, making you intolerant. that's the irony of your post.

john9blue wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

john9blue wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:PS nice to see you back Woodruff.

Thanks, but I suspect it's not going to last long. I can only tolerate indiscriminate intolerance for so long, and that level is getting lower and lower the older I get.

if you can't beat 'em, join 'em, amirite?

Ah yes, Mr Moderate...as soon as you can point my indiscriminate intolerance, then we'll be good to continue the conversation.

you just said that you were unable to tolerate indiscriminate intolerance, making you intolerant. that's the irony of your post.

Actually, I said I could tolerate it...but only for so long before I had to remove myself from the situation, which I would suggest is absolutely a form of tolerance. Nice try, but you've failed spectacularly.

It's good to know you're still an idiot.

Woodruff wrote:

john9blue wrote:you just said that you were unable to tolerate indiscriminate intolerance, making you intolerant. that's the irony of your post.

Actually, I said I could tolerate it...but only for so long before I had to remove myself from the situation, which I would suggest is absolutely a form of tolerance. Nice try, but you've failed spectacularly.

It's good to know you're still an idiot.

so removing yourself puts you in a quantum state between tolerance and intolerance... wat?

you either tolerate something or you don't. there's no third option lol

john9blue wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

john9blue wrote:you just said that you were unable to tolerate indiscriminate intolerance, making you intolerant. that's the irony of your post.

Actually, I said I could tolerate it...but only for so long before I had to remove myself from the situation, which I would suggest is absolutely a form of tolerance. Nice try, but you've failed spectacularly.

It's good to know you're still an idiot.

so removing yourself puts you in a quantum state between tolerance and intolerance... wat?

you either tolerate something or you don't. there's no third option lol

You used to have a better grasp of logic. What has happened to you? Perhaps your desire to argue with me has tainted your ability to think clearly?

If I do nothing to try to stop something from happening, I am tolerating its existence. It is simply easier for me to tolerate if I am no longer being subjected to that situation, so I remove myself from that situation. Intolerance is actively trying to get that situation to stop by some action.

You're trying too hard, John.

I've wasted my time on worse arguments. Carry on, gentlemen.

BigBallinStalin wrote:I've wasted my time on worse arguments. Carry on, gentlemen.

Gentlemen ios overstating a bit, but yes, i concur ole chap, what what.

BigBallinStalin wrote:I've wasted my time on worse arguments. Carry on, gentlemen.

With some people, wasting time is the goal...

Lootifer wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:I've wasted my time on worse arguments. Carry on, gentlemen.

Gentlemen ios overstating a bit, but yes, i concur ole chap, what what.

JOHN BLUE IS TOO A GENTLEMAN! He and I are both survivors. I understand what he goes through and he handles it like a gentleman!

Phatscotty wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:I've wasted my time on worse arguments. Carry on, gentlemen.

With some people, wasting time is the goal...

Disagree, some conversations might become less productive than others here. I don't think they are a waste of time.

2dimes wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:I've wasted my time on worse arguments. Carry on, gentlemen.

With some people, wasting time is the goal...

Disagree, some conversations might become less productive than others here. I don't think they are a waste of time.

I agree. But for some people, wasting time is their goal

Only in the same way buying beer is eating money. After all you can get water out of the faucet for much less.

is this thread now about time-wasting arguments we've had with woody?

i'm not sure if i can convince him that "i can only tolerate it for so long before i tolerate it" is an idiotic thing to say.

i won't get my hopes up though...

john9blue wrote:i'm not sure if i can convince him that "i can only tolerate it for so long before i tolerate it" is an idiotic thing to say.

I wouldn't expect you to understand what the concept of tolerance means, John, but you're still trying way too hard. Not that I particularly mind you continuing to embarrass yourself, but I would think that you'd mind it.

would it be accurate to say that i'm tolerating your bullshit right now?

john9blue wrote:would it be accurate to say that i'm tolerating your bullshit right now?

I suppose if you consider it bullshit, sure. Alternatively, you could explore the English language and discover its vast complexity for yourself!

why not both?

J9B v Woody bears a strange similarity to PS v Sym...

Lootifer wrote:J9B v Woody bears a strange similarity to PS v Sym...

I hadn't noticed Phatscotty and Symmetry go at each other much. BBS and Symmetry, on the other hand...

Well anyone v Symm really... f*ck REAL DEBATE, LETS ARGUE SEMANTICS!

Lootifer wrote:Well anyone v Symm really... f*ck REAL DEBATE, LETS ARGUE SEMANTICS!

Doesn't real debate involve the meanings of the terms being employed?

Symmetry wrote:

Lootifer wrote:Well anyone v Symm really... f*ck REAL DEBATE, LETS ARGUE SEMANTICS!

Doesn't real debate involve the meanings of the terms being employed?

It becomes productive when you get past that point. Most of the time, you're still languishing in some fruitless muddle. Sorry.