Conquer Club

Phatscotty wrote:I voted totally. I'm the one who gets stalked, so I would know.

So had you not brought him back, there would be little or no value in your return?

2dimes wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:I voted totally. I'm the one who gets stalked, so I would know.

So had you not brought him back, there would be little or no value in your return?

My threads are optional. If you don't like them then you can ignore them, and my value can be irrelevant!

That was a question actually. There's a little symbol there that should be a tip off. You know, because you voted it was worth bringing you back "to get him".

In my opinion you bringing him back was obviously a statement.

Now me thinks I've been double reverse trolled.

Heh. I'm one of the two "no" votes. Honestly, I just happened to realize I should probably check back to see if my ban was over or not. I'm not actually sure when it ended, but I don't think it was very long ago.

I don't get the non-kittens option, though. BRING BACK THE KITTEHS!!!!!

I only like your cat and mine that died decades ago. None in my poles.

Sorry you don't think it's worth bringing Scotty back. I'm still happy there's only three of you that feel that way.

I like both you guys so I didn't think of this as being as mean as it might be perceived. I'm kind of dumb I suppose. See you later.

2dimes wrote:I only like your cat and mine that died decades ago. None in my poles.

Sorry you don't think it's worth bringing Scotty back. I'm still happy there's only three of you that feel that way.

I like both you guys so I didn't think of this as being as mean as it might be perceived. I'm kind of dumb I suppose. See you later.

Huh...I think I mis-read the poll. I didn't think it was mean at all, actually. I thought the question was "Did Phatscotty coming back bring back Woodruff?". Did the poll change, or have I suddenly lost my ability to read coherently?

Yes! The more the merrier!

2dimes wrote:That was a question actually. There's a little symbol there that should be a tip off. You know, because you voted it was worth bringing you back "to get him".

In my opinion you bringing him back was obviously a statement.

Now me thinks I've been double reverse trolled.

I didn't see it as "worth it" just that I did bring him back. I think he feels the need to smear me, because I am so effective.

If I was just a crazy moron, there would be no need to point it out, not even constantly...

I didn't think of it being malicious. I was trying to be playful. I would not have done this one today because everyone seems to be cranky with you. I'm just not getting it to be honest.

2dimes wrote:I didn't think of it being malicious. I was trying to be playful. I would not have done this one today because everyone seems to be cranky with you. I'm just not getting it to be honest.

no it's my bad, I think I read the title as the question. I see it now

I do typically just ask the question in the title so I should stick to the format.

Phatscotty wrote:I think he feels the need to smear me, because I am so effective.

Based on how little credibility you seem to have in these fora, I would say you're actually not very effective at all.

Phatscotty wrote:If I was just a crazy moron, there would be no need to point it out, not even constantly...

Repitition can create reality to the uninformed, and I am going to make sure that your repitition of bullshit doesn't harm anyone in that manner.

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:I think he feels the need to smear me, because I am so effective.

Based on how little credibility you seem to have in these fora, I would say you're actually not very effective at all.

Phatscotty wrote:If I was just a crazy moron, there would be no need to point it out, not even constantly...

Repitition can create reality to the uninformed, and I am going to make sure that your repitition of bullshit doesn't harm anyone in that manner.

Is that your way of saying you are a Nazi?

oh, how precious!

Phatscotty wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:I think he feels the need to smear me, because I am so effective.

Based on how little credibility you seem to have in these fora, I would say you're actually not very effective at all.

Phatscotty wrote:If I was just a crazy moron, there would be no need to point it out, not even constantly...

Repitition can create reality to the uninformed, and I am going to make sure that your repitition of bullshit doesn't harm anyone in that manner.

oh how precious!

I thought you foed me? You can't even "do coward" without being a hypocrite. Amazing how you've managed to overlook all of my posts that contain rebuttals to your points...fascinating how that works.

I can and do tolerate a lot of things, but liars and thieves I have no stomach for. NO STOMACH AT ALL!

I pray for you

Phatscotty wrote:I can and do tolerate a lot of things, but liars and thieves I have no stomach for. NO STOMACH AT ALL!

I'm not sure how you can stand yourself then.

Phatscotty wrote:I pray for you

Thanks Mr. Not-Religious. I'll pity you.

I'd try for reconciliation but I couldn't get Nietzsche and Funkyterence to settle their difference so I don't think that's my Internet forte.

Well there's that too. Thing is if that was the only issue, which is part of what I thought before, they could have got around it.

I was never even able to figure out a disagreement. They must have had something go on via PM they wouldn't let go of.

I pretty much like having both of them here, though I definitely do not agree with a lot that Phattscotty says.. and do sometimes take exception to some of his tactics in discussions.

Cannot say I always agree with Woodruff, either, though in many cases I do. I generally find Woodruff more willing to research things he says and less likely to just dismiss things with which he disagrees.

2dimes wrote:I'd try for reconciliation but I couldn't get Nietzsche and Funkyterence to settle their difference so I don't think that's my Internet forte.

I have reached out to Woodruff many times. Just look in his welcome back thread with all the kittens. I don't have anything against him, even though he has crossed a lot of lines with me, I know it's just out of hate, but that is also the reason I just have to separate myself from him. I have asked him nicely to chill out and stop calling names, I have begged him to foe me. I am and always have been perfectly fine with walking away, turning the other cheek, foeing, ignoring, being the bigger man. I would happily stay away from his posts and mind my own business, but it takes two 2 tango. It can't happen while he is stalking me.

Everyone's filter works harder in text. I have upset people speaking to the but far less often than when typing back and forth.

Phatscotty wrote:Just look in his welcome back thread with all the kittens. I don't have anything against him, even though he has crossed a lot of lines with me, I know it's just out of hate

If you sincerely believe that any amount of "hate" is involved, you're not very intelligent. You're not worth the time to hate.

Phatscotty wrote:but that is also the reason I just have to separate myself from him.

No, the reason you just have to separate yourself from me is because you simply can't answer the points I've brought up to you, and the only way you can give the appearance of still winning is to just ignore them as if they didn't happen.

Phatscotty wrote:I have asked him nicely to chill out and stop calling names, I have begged him to foe me.

Interestingly, you have claimed to foe me...what is it...eight or nine times now? As for the names, they'll stop being appropriate when you stop living up to them.

Phatscotty wrote:I am and always have been perfectly fine with walking away, turning the other cheek, foeing, ignoring, being the bigger man. I would happily stay away from his posts and mind my own business, but it takes two 2 tango. It can't happen while he is stalking me.

But that's just it...you DO ignore almost everything I say that is relevant to the topic being discussed, because you know you have no response to it. That isn't "being the bigger man", that's "being a coward".

And I certainly don't stalk you. We both just happen to post a lot. Much as you're not worth the time to hate, you're definitely not worth the time to stalk.

This post is for recording the fact that I am joking about woodruff returning because phatscotty returned, even though that coincidence was too delicious to not make this joke. I know being soft like this is ruining further comedy via torturing them foe it.

Maybe Scotty is just trying to seem pleasant with this part but that is something.

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just look in his welcome back thread with all the kittens. I don't have anything against him, even though he has crossed a lot of lines with me, I know it's just out of hate

If you sincerely believe that any amount of "hate" is involved, you're not very intelligent. You're not worth the time to hate.

Maybe read this one out loud or get someone to read it to you. It's pretty malicious. I'll give you the benefit of doubt. Just appears to contain some vitriol, I guess your writing style being a bit serious, happens toward gruff.

Could just be my personal filter. I feel like I could slip in, "Well shoot, of course I hate you but I don't devote any energy to it." Even though I believe you were/are thinking it should read like, "Smarten up, I don't hate you, I'm part Vulcan man. Let's have a reasoned logical debate. I would like more second party literature to back up your opinions.

Amirite?