Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:I don't see a way to get 560 out of that.
hecter wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:I don't see a way to get 560 out of that.
It says that x would get less. That must mean that you get LESS money if you invested more.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Stopper wrote:Because if profits were shared equally, X would get £1,600 (£4,800/3), which is £560 less than the share Anarkists worked out (£2,160.)
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
catseyeagate wrote:I guess I was misinformed...Thanks alot. You're the best, but how did you get 20 again...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Stopper wrote:Because if profits were shared equally, X would get £1,600 (£4,800/3), which is £560 less than the share Anarkists worked out (£2,160.)
But they aren't shared equally... It says specifically that the profits are divided the way that the money was invested...
Not split evenly three ways.
If the profits are 4800, how much less would X receive if the money was divided out equally than if the profits were divided in proportion to the amount invested?
Anarkistsdream wrote:Stopper wrote:Because if profits were shared equally, X would get £1,600 (£4,800/3), which is £560 less than the share Anarkists worked out (£2,160.)
But they aren't shared equally... It says specifically that the profits are divided the way that the money was invested...
Not split evenly three ways.
3 individuals form a partnership and agree to divide the profits equally.
hecter wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Stopper wrote:Because if profits were shared equally, X would get £1,600 (£4,800/3), which is £560 less than the share Anarkists worked out (£2,160.)
But they aren't shared equally... It says specifically that the profits are divided the way that the money was invested...
Not split evenly three ways.
I think it's the way it was worded. It's probably meant to say:If the profits are 4800, how much less would X receive if the money was divided out equally than if the profits were divided in proportion to the amount invested?
hecter wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Stopper wrote:Because if profits were shared equally, X would get £1,600 (£4,800/3), which is £560 less than the share Anarkists worked out (£2,160.)
But they aren't shared equally... It says specifically that the profits are divided the way that the money was invested...
Not split evenly three ways.
I think it's the way it was worded. It's probably meant to say:If the profits are 4800, how much less would X receive if the money was divided out equally than if the profits were divided in proportion to the amount invested?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Stopper wrote:The question is worded correctly. Go back and read it.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:By the way, that is why I majored in English and Journalism and not math...
Stopper wrote:I could be talking out of my arse here, but would Anarkists' method be favoured by someone who attempted to do the sums in their head?
Backward as that may seem.
EDIT: I mean the idea of mental arithmetic is backward, not Anarkists...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
wicked wrote:MM, stop spamming then.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users