jay_a2j wrote:suggs wrote:Have to say, think its a pretty strong argument.
Otherwise plant lovers would havea real case, as trees etc are clearly "biologically" alive.
It neatly simplifies the abortion debate too.
You have got to be kidding! I can't be involved with a debate with the irrational.
jay i think it might be helpful to try and look at the view like this.
What do you believe makes humans different (better) than other species?
In some senses i would guess youd argue something related to the soul, some concept that only is related to humans.
Essentially this argument is based in a notion that humans do have something specific to them and not to animals.
However instead of the some what metaphysical soul, its the process of being able to have wants and desires outside the instinctual, to have the ability to cognitize oneself into the future, to project empathy and other complex emotive charcteristics that only humans have.
If you argue that he is irrational for essential believing that the abortion debate is simplified because the fetus does not have those elements of humanity (a subjective thing) you are in essence aruging your only stance is irrational because you are arguing about a subjective charcteristic that is equally unable to be proven.