MeDeFe wrote:Symmetry wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Symmetry wrote:Hannibał wrote:Haha I was going more for the pose, then the women in the first picture. The 2nd is Stacy Dash, best known from clueless, why isn't anyone quoting the good pictures lol.
Also that english lady looks MUCH better after makeup artists do their thing with her, way to make me feel like a jerk..but her ass still looks like a half cooked pancake
Possibly because the "good pictures" violate the guidelines of the forum.
GuidelinesAny images of pornographic activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.
And let's face it- those are images of nudity. No two ways about it- those are pictures of nude women. The guidelines are very clear that any such images are not allowed. You should consider removing them.
The nipples, the genitals and the anus are not visible, that means she's not nude, even though she's not wearing any clothes.
I'm not sure if you're being ironic or not, but not wearing any clothes is pretty much the definition of being nude. I've had a brief chat with Moderator RD and it has been pointed out that the basic intention of that guideline is to prevent the posting of pornography. I completely accept that, and while I think that post was mildly pornographic, I can see why others would not.
There are no "nipples, areola, genitals, anuses visible", and while there is an abundance of the "etc" that can be said about many of the pictures on this thread.
I am sort of fascinated by this particular definition of nudity though. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody hears it, does it make a sound? If a naked women turns her back to you is she no longer naked?
Change the guidelines.
In my opinion the guidelines regarding nudity/pornography are fine as they are, no nipples/areola, no anuses, no genitals. There's a clear line that's not to be crossed, hardly any room at all for interpretation, and still a lot of freedom to post hot and sexy images. A forum guideline can hardly get any better.
If you want me to I can start an internal TeamCC discussion about pornography and nudity on your behalf, though.
To be honest, I don't really want to cause you guys any bother. I absolutely know that I've been a bit of a dick to people on this thread, and I hope you realise that people have been flaming, bating and reporting me for stuff that's been pretty unreasonable too. Now I should level with you absolutely.
You and I both know that that's a nude woman.
You and I both know that the rules say that nudity isn't allowed.
You and I both know that I'm being a bit of a dick for pointing that out.
You and I both know that you're being a bit of a dick by claiming that she isn't nude.
So let me level with the people on this thread absolutely and with no ambiguity. I think it's pretty clear that this a thread for a bunch of guys to get sexual kicks. That's what it's for. It's not for aesthetic appreciation of women. It's no longer about finding the #1 female of 2007, and I think that picking the #1 female of 2007 by virtue of Hot/Sexy/NSFW pics is pretty offensive.
This thread went way off topic a long time ago, and it maintains its popularity by a kind of blind eye turned towards the OP and the general guidelines of the forum. Indeed, my posts seem to have actually required a moderator to change the title specifically to allow this thread to solely be about posting nudey pics of women. Guys in swimming trunks being completely off topic, and indeed, so offensive that I was reported.
So let's be absolutely clear, we both know what this thread is for. No more beating around the bush (and I'm aware that might have sexual connotations, but I mean it in its more general sense), this is a thread for people to get sexually aroused by pictures of sexy women. We both know that there is no other way I could be accused of ruining this thread, as I have frequently been, without that being the case. Without that, there would be no complaints, no reports, no accusations.
I hope I'm being direct enough here, and that we're pretty much on the same page.
No more pretending that when I called KoolBack a "Master Baiter" that I wasn't referring to masturbation, or indeed when I suggested that posters were here to "mass debate" that I wasn't making a joke about that too. Let's be clear- this isn't a thread for appreciating feminine beauty, or about figuring out where women turn up in various degrees of ranking. It's about titillation and sexy kicks.
If you really need to change the rules to make this thread viable, then maybe you should consider asking the other mods if this kind of thread was really what the rules were set up to allow.
I think I've largely leveled with you on this, so perhaps, in your heart of hearts, you might at some point admit that a person with no clothes on is nude.
The Emperor's New Clothes