ender516 wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:Miranda Kerr ... yum ...yum ..
Agreed.AndyDufresne wrote:greenoaks wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:
you have posted in the wrong thread Andy. this is the HOT + SEXY thread. let me show you how it's done.
I like a HOT + SEXY with some brains and nerdism.
Agreed.Gillipig wrote:crispybits wrote:Pic would have been x^n times better if that top button was undone imo
n doesn't say much. n can be "1" for example, which would imply that you don't think it's an improvement at all. If you're going to go all nerdy like Andy, I suggest you replace n with π, or ∞ if you really think an unbuttoned top would lift the pic to new heights.
And to stay on topic:
Actually if n was zero then there would be no improvement as x^0 is always 1. x^1 is x, which is unknown. Take care with your nerdism when the Tech Team is watching.
And as far as staying on topic goes, I doubt I would be able to speak at all faced with those, errr, um, that t-shirt.notyou2 wrote:Gillipig wrote:
Catwalks always crack me up lol. Or, I get a boner, either way I win !
Why is she wearing a giant shower scrub on her head?
I thought it was a dish mop. Get in the kitchen and make me a sammich.
Ah, my bad, I don't have an excuse right now but give me a couple of days and I'll try to explain why I made that mistake, actually I might try to argue that I was not wrong at all just so I can save face.....Damn am I thinking out loud again?