Nobunaga wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Nobunaga wrote:pimpdave wrote:Nobunaga wrote:... Btw, still waiting for your constitutional justification for the federal mandate forcing me to purchase insurance.
Because your tears are like sweet nectar.
... Yeah, well, she throws shite out there and when you ask her to back it up... nothing but crickets.
Yeah, such terrible stuff that several federal judges have already agreed with me, so ridiculous that the issue is now sitting in the Supreme court... as yet undecided, and that even though the current Supreme court is packed with Big business patsies.
... Agreed with you?! You've made no constitutional argument. You agreed you would, after you got over your cold, or dyed your hair, or gave your kid a bath or whatever it was this time. I'm not asking for a legal presentation, just in your own words - back up that mandate.
... And I am still waiting.
Well, since you claim ignorance, its that whole ability of the government to make rules necessary for the safety and security of the nation.
Beyond that, I have not said you have no grounds for your view, just that your ignorance of the opposition makes you sound like a raving lunatic instead of a legitimate debater.
MY views is that its far more constitutional than this idea that corporations have the right to give whatever they want to political campaigns in the name of free speech.. a LOT more. Yet, strangely, the same people who seem to opposed to one idea see no problem with the other.
I think we need a fully nationalized healthcare system.