Americans: What political party are you part of?

[sfhbballnut]

yep, at last we agree on something

[sfhbballnut]

Bush isn't as bad a president as he's made out to be, there are few who could do as well as he has in the situation.

[cowshrptrn]

I'm not saying I don't have a party, I'm saying they all need to go, its political reform in the interest of the American people, who the parties seem to have forgotten put them in power and are fighting there battles, not the battles of the people

i agree. George Washington did NOT want these parties... I don't really know how they got started.

ahh, the wonders of comparative government. Because we have a first past the post system (SMD plurality, call it what you will), it's pretty much guaranteed to end up with two main parties, duverger's law (i'm sure i butchered the spelling of his name...)

Essentially, the third parties can have jsut as many constituents as the main parties, but if they're spread out throughout the different voting districts, then they can't capture any seats since they dont' get a majority in any of the districts.

Proportional representation systems work SOO much better in the sense of a variety of parties in the legislature, however they're not nearly as efficient as SMD pluralities since there's less bickering. Its a trade off.

[cowshrptrn]

Bush isn't as bad a president as he's made out to be, there are few who could do as well as he has in the situation.

what are you talking about?!?!?! he dindt' do anything all that great. He didnt' veto a single bill for the longest time, meaning he's essentially a puppet of his party! He handled hurricane Katrina TERRIBLY, he handled the war in Iraq TERRIBLY, first off he shoulnd't ahve even gone in there, second of all if he DID go there he should ahve had some sort of strategy, instead THOUSANDS of innocent Iraqi civilians are DIEING, you cna't jsut stand bakc and say "oops, my bad" to the families of all of those innocent civilians becasue you didn't plan for a replacement govenrment once you destroyed the existing government!

Another point that shows he has no idea what he's doing: his entire cabinet is practically his dad's cabinet, he stuck in justice alito, which destroys the balance of the supreme court. He's trying to undo some of the greatest accomplishments of the Warren court, fewer rights for the accused, forcing his belief on abortion onto others, the list goes on and on.

[Joe McCarthy]

He's been ok, but not great. Its right to say he isnt as bad as he's been made out to be, because hes been made out to be terrible. It's true that he's spent too much money and hasn't done much of anything to stop abortions, but he's gotten in two good Supreme Court Justices, Alito and Roberts, and he got rid of the Taliban and Sadaam. He could have done better but he did allright.

[Blitzkreig]

Bush isn't as bad a president as he's made out to be, there are few who could do as well as he has in the situation.

what are you talking about?!?!?! he dindt' do anything all that great. He didnt' veto a single bill for the longest time, meaning he's essentially a puppet of his party! He handled hurricane Katrina TERRIBLY, he handled the war in Iraq TERRIBLY, first off he shoulnd't ahve even gone in there, second of all if he DID go there he should ahve had some sort of strategy, instead THOUSANDS of innocent Iraqi civilians are DIEING, you cna't jsut stand bakc and say "oops, my bad" to the families of all of those innocent civilians becasue you didn't plan for a replacement govenrment once you destroyed the existing government!

Another point that shows he has no idea what he's doing: his entire cabinet is practically his dad's cabinet, he stuck in justice alito, which destroys the balance of the supreme court. He's trying to undo some of the greatest accomplishments of the Warren court, fewer rights for the accused, forcing his belief on abortion onto others, the list goes on and on.

Please give some semblence of a logical arguement you simply say that he's a bad president because people died, like under almost EVERY president. How could Katrina been handled differently? It was not he that mishandled it but FEMA. The bill vetoing is debateable. And what politician isn't a puppet? They all get rid of they're own morals in order to fit the cookie cutter mold of the current party.

[Joe McCarthy]

What kills me about the statement is the SCOTUS balance argument. Since when is it the Presidents' job to keep some kind of balance on the SCOTUS? Roberts and Alito were very well qualified. That's the Presidents job, to nominate qualified judges whose judicial philosphies he agrees with. But I guess you'd want a liberal President to put in a conservative Justice for balance, right cow? Please quit pretending you expect Presidents to nominate people from the other side for the Court, its just stupid sounding.

[Jolly Roger]

What kills me about the statement is the SCOTUS balance argument. Since when is it the Presidents' job to keep some kind of balance on the SCOTUS? Roberts and Alito were very well qualified. That's the Presidents job, to nominate qualified judges whose judicial philosphies he agrees with. But I guess you'd want a liberal President to put in a conservative Justice for balance, right cow? Please quit pretending you expect Presidents to nominate people from the other side for the Court, its just stupid sounding.

Can I give a shout out to Harriet Miers?

[Joe McCarthy]

oh yeah, and it hardly even mattered what FEMA did in Katrina. The state and local governments handled things so badly it was almost like they were trying to make it worse. How in the f*ck does the mayor NOT use the available busses to get people out, or make some effort to ready the Superdome if he's going to use that for a shelter? How does the Governor REFUSE help from the national Guard when Bush calls to tell her hes got a caravan of them at the state border ready to go to the dome with supplies? Lousiana politicians are the most corrupt and least able in the history of the damn planet, if you live there you take your damn chances and it's not GWBs' fault what happens to you.

[sfhbballnut]

People need to stop blaming the president for everything, not just bush, but any president. He doesn't have as much power as people think, at least not in ways they can see, he is not personaly responsible for everything that goes on and he does not handle all that stuff personally, he's not supposed to have to.

[boogiesadda]

Bush isn't as bad a president as he's made out to be, there are few who could do as well as he has in the situation.

AS WELL AS HE HAS?????!!!!!! you mean at creating a civil war in Iraq? Killing thousands of Soldiers and countless Civilians? With the US economy? With Foreign affairs? With sucking Israel's dick and licking their balls? Hurricane Katrina? September 11th when he sat there like a deer in the headlights? Which one?? I am just confused as to what he is doing so well?? Please fill me in...and no I am not a muslim so don't even try some stupid ass remark about muslims.

[cowshrptrn]

Please give some semblence of a logical arguement you simply say that he's a bad president because people died, like under almost EVERY president.

Its not becasue people died, its becasue he didnt' have a clear strategy going into the war, its fairly obvious to anyone who has a basic grasp of politics that if you get rid of the current government, you need a replacement. He dind't think the war through ahead of time. In fact, more people are probably dieing from the chaos in the streets than from Sadaam's genocide.

He also got rid of Colin Powell, the only person in his cabinet to be hesitant about going into the war because they dindt' have sufficient evidence.

oh yeah, and it hardly even mattered what FEMA did in Katrina. The state and local governments handled things so badly it was almost like they were trying to make it worse.

in other words: since its a futile effort, he might as well just stay out on his ranch clearing brush while theres a national crisis going on instead of trying to get something done, getting on the mayor's back and trying to get everything going smoothly.

He also happneed to appoint the head of FEMA, who he only hired because of personal ties, granted a lot fo presidents grant positions based on personal ties, but usually its some insignificant position liek ambassador to some random country, and if it is a significant position at least make sure they guy is somewhat competent. How can it take 5 hours after a tsunami hits to do anything, espdecially when you can see the tsunami coming for at least a half hour before hand.

Bush may not be directly responsible, but he IS responsible for appointing heads of FEMA who had absolutely no disaster management experience.

[sfhbballnut]

Why does the government need to give the public full and detailed reports on why we're going to war and what's going on in the war? Let's broadcast exactly what we're doing so the people will be happy and see how that affects our armed forces. Anybody ever think that there may have been more to the reasoning behind the deployment that the government hasn't let us in on because of how we got the information or how it would affect the troops. If there had been as much publicity in any other war as there is in this one we may never have gotten through any of them because the spineless politicians would be afraid to do anything for feear of losing public approval.

[sfhbballnut]

We have the right to be informed, but not until later, especialy in war, the government would be stupid to tell us all about everything they do and so they don't.

[sfhbballnut]

And the contraversy over the government tracking and listening on the phones is completely retarded, even if they were doing that, what have you got to hide? They would have no right to use whatever they found unless it was a matter of security. So why do so many people care?