Forum

by **sfhbballnut** on Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:06 pm

I want to see college overtime in the NFL and playoffs in the NCAA, just a tourny of the top eight to be simple, or top sixteen if you want to get complex and unreallistic

by **P Gizzle** on Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:20 pm

i say 64 teams and i wanna see one foot ins int the NFL

by **sfhbballnut** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:48 pm

Possibly, the exact rule would have to be adjusted for it to work. I think the reason the have that is to even out offense and defense so the offenses doesn't have some advantage

by **P Gizzle** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:50 pm

i just like that rule because it's more exciting. ooohh, two feet, i mean that's a lot harder and less exciting than someone barely letting his foot hit the ground, and TD!!!!!!!!!!

by **vtmarik** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:58 pm

P Gizzle wrote:i just like that rule because it's more exciting. ooohh, two feet, i mean that's a lot harder and less exciting than someone barely letting his foot hit the ground, and TD!!!!!!!!!!

Who cares about the player? It's Football. It should only matter if the ball is in the end zone.

by **P Gizzle** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:01 pm

well, it's not just the endzone. the rule is that in order for a catch to be called, in nfl, you have to have two feet in bounds. i like it better in NCAA where it's only one foot.

do you watch football, or not? i just want to know so i can explain things better.

by **vtmarik** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:10 pm

P Gizzle wrote:well, it's not just the endzone. the rule is that in order for a catch to be called, in nfl, you have to have two feet in bounds. i like it better in NCAA where it's only one foot.

do you watch football, or not? i just want to know so i can explain things better.

I'm familiar with the in-bounds rules, I'm just saying if the catch is made and the player gets the ball over the line into the end zone, it should be a TD.

by **P Gizzle** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:12 pm

i agree. and that's how it is in NFL. you get the ball to "break the plane" then ur alright. see this is where controversy comes in though. it's impossible to tell sometimes. stuff like this happened in the Super Bowl and that's where Seahawks fans like me get mad

by **vtmarik** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:20 pm

P Gizzle wrote:i agree. and that's how it is in NFL. you get the ball to "break the plane" then ur alright. see this is where controversy comes in though. it's impossible to tell sometimes. stuff like this happened in the Super Bowl and that's where Seahawks fans like me get mad

As long as you have officials on the field, you're going to have bad officiating.

Why don't they have a ref up in the booth with the broadcasters so they can get a birds-eye view of the play? Then there might be less confusion.

And on the subject of the BCS, I don't see why it exists. I honestly don't see why it ever existed. You take the champions from each division, but them into a tournament, winner is national champion.

Why is this supposedly so difficult?

by **sfhbballnut** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:22 pm

The reciever still has to make a catch before its a touchdown, and that means stayng in bounds so that one needs to stay

by **P Gizzle** on Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:09 pm

vtmarik wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:i agree. and that's how it is in NFL. you get the ball to "break the plane" then ur alright. see this is where controversy comes in though. it's impossible to tell sometimes. stuff like this happened in the Super Bowl and that's where Seahawks fans like me get mad

As long as you have officials on the field, you're going to have bad officiating.

Why don't they have a ref up in the booth with the broadcasters so they can get a birds-eye view of the play? Then there might be less confusion.

And on the subject of the BCS, I don't see why it exists. I honestly don't see why it ever existed. You take the champions from each division, but them into a tournament, winner is national champion.

Why is this supposedly so difficult?

i completely agree with you on both subjects!!!