Moderator: Tournament Directors
SoundStatic wrote:Thanks for the insights - I have ideas/plans for a bunch of the tournaments already, I just need to figure out how to fairly distribute the maximum amount of points of each tournament. In ATP there are designated majors and such that have more points, but whose to say which Olympic disciplines are more important? Should I go by the amount of events in each discipline or the ones that people watch more, or just keep all the top possible points even across all 15.
SoundStatic wrote:With the disciplines I've fleshed out already, I've kept each tournament structure and rules as close to an actual medal event as possible.
The issue I'm coming across is that here there's eventually going to be one winner overall, but with the Olympics, they don't do that. Even the most winning nation in medals doesn't get anything special but recognition from the media broadcasts. I mean, it could be kept as simple as only recording the gold, silver, or bronze winner in each game, but it's completely possible that we could have different winner each tournament and we'd be stuck in a 15-way tie for first at the end.
Users browsing this forum: y2manypbr