Forum

by **TeeGee** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:05 pm

in please

by **trinicardinal** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:06 pm

TeeGee wrote:in please

You're in

by **bearshark3** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:42 pm

sure, pencil me in

by **trinicardinal** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:47 pm

bearshark3 wrote:sure, pencil me in

And that's a wrap.... thanks guys

by **TheTrueNorth** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:06 pm

Hate this map........in plz

by **trinicardinal** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:25 pm

TheTrueNorth wrote:Hate this map........in plz

I'll add you in as a reserve since the tournament is full

by **nmvfd18** on Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:34 pm

in please

by **rgrjoey001** on Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:40 pm

in please

by **DoomYoshi** on Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:56 pm

I already don't like this tournament. The games should come one at a time, or 2 at a time. Right now with 6 games going it's more "I'm overwhelmed by trying to keep my games straight" than "I'm exploring this map and learning how to play it".

by **trinicardinal** on Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:52 am

DoomYoshi wrote:I already don't like this tournament. The games should come one at a time, or 2 at a time. Right now with 6 games going it's more "I'm overwhelmed by trying to keep my games straight" than "I'm exploring this map and learning how to play it".

I'm sorry to hear that DY. I made it clear in the first post that all games will be played at the same time but I'll also consider your comments for any future Map Explorers tournaments

by **DD2** on Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:12 am

How are people listed with "10" wins when only 6 games were sent out?

by **uyumaykimaw** on Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:25 am

DD2 wrote:How are people listed with "10" wins when only 6 games were sent out?

cuz the number of wins listed is not the number of wins in this tourney.....it is the number of wins the player had on this map at the time of sign up(if over 10 wins at time of sign up then does not qualify for the tourney).

by **rjhankey** on Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:49 pm

This is an interesting format -- Yoshi is right that it's a challenge to keep track of the games, I'm just leaving more notes in the game chat than usual to try and keep up! It's also an interesting twist in that you're playing within your group of 4, but with different partners, so as you share game strategies with one partner in a game, you're potentially indicating your tendency in another game against that same player. Just observations, things to think about for the next iteration of this type of tournament.

by **trinicardinal** on Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:41 am

uyumaykimaw wrote:
DD2 wrote:How are people listed with "10" wins when only 6 games were sent out?

cuz the number of wins listed is not the number of wins in this tourney.....it is the number of wins the player had on this map at the time of sign up(if over 10 wins at time of sign up then does not qualify for the tourney).

that about sums it up.

rjhankey wrote:This is an interesting format -- Yoshi is right that it's a challenge to keep track of the games, I'm just leaving more notes in the game chat than usual to try and keep up! It's also an interesting twist in that you're playing within your group of 4, but with different partners, so as you share game strategies with one partner in a game, you're potentially indicating your tendency in another game against that same player. Just observations, things to think about for the next iteration of this type of tournament.

Yes it is interesting. Depending on the feedback from this tournament, future tournaments with a similar structure will likely have some changes to them... Of course future Map Explorers Tournaments will not all be Team tournaments either.. some will be 1v1's, 5 or 6 player etc.