Moderator: Tournament Directors
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Rodion wrote:I prefer the version with 72, but if the tournament ends up not filling, we could go with 40 (doubles and triples), 48 (doubles and quadruples) or 56 (triples and quadruples) players, I suppose.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:If the tournament doesn't fill to 72 which of the two types are most likely to be picked? (doubles, triples, and quads)
Rodion wrote:Fircoal wrote:If the tournament doesn't fill to 72 which of the two types are most likely to be picked? (doubles, triples, and quads)
If we reach 56, triples + quads.
If we reach 48, doubles + quads.
If we reach 40, doubles + triples.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Pirlo wrote:I'd like to join this epic sir Rodion.. as a player of course
Users browsing this forum: No registered users