Game 4517495
won by slickstick
Moderator: Tournament Directors
Haggis_McMutton wrote:I've got a few questions.
If i choose to defend a terit that has only one army on it, the attacker has to win 2 out of three games to take my terit?
And if i choose to defend from a terit with 2 or 3 armies on it, the attacker also has to win two out of three games?
So basically larger stacks of armies are only useful for attacking purposes?
Thanks
TaCktiX wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:I've got a few questions.
If i choose to defend a terit that has only one army on it, the attacker has to win 2 out of three games to take my terit?
And if i choose to defend from a terit with 2 or 3 armies on it, the attacker also has to win two out of three games?
So basically larger stacks of armies are only useful for attacking purposes?
Thanks
I also answered this in PM, but I'll add a table here to note the niceness of lots of armies in defense.
Armies in Defense -- Games Played -- Games Attacker must win to take over
1 -- 1 -- 1
2 -- 3 -- 2
3 -- 5 -- 3
4 -- 7 -- 4
And so on. Additional attacking armies merely give the attacker a chance to redo matches he lost in the original series, and if the defender did well enough in the initial series, he's lost all those extra armies.
Defend: Any player attacking the territory must win a best-of-3 series (2 victories) to conquer the territory.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users