World 2.0/1 Map [Quenched]

[zim]

Hi relatively new to CC but am loving it and would like to contribute something to the community. My initial thought was a relatively accurate world map with substantially different dynamics than classic (though I haven't given the continent bonuses, etc. much though). I've done a mock up of my initial thinking (it's 1245x600 so if the 800x600 is a hard limit I'll have to do some scaling) shown here.



I'd like to guage whether there is interest and also whether 1200x600 is possible or should I wield the eraser.

Cheers,

Mark

P.S. The current version as of October 25 looks like:

[Gilligan]

a lotta territories

[P Gizzle]

Great for Battle Royale! you should definitely do it.

[devilseyesdd]

should be like for tornements and for more then 8 players and should be able to pick wat contried u want cause that would suck to be scatered on that map

[AndyDufresne]

One obvious problem is country dispersion. Take a look at the west, and then look at Africa and beyond. Would be rather difficult to fit names and army shadows in the smaller areas.


--Andy

[spiesr]

Accuracy generaly=not so good playability

[slash1890]

I don't know. It'd be a very difficult idea to pursue, but I'm pretty interested to see how it would turn out.

[Marvaddin]

One obvious problem is country dispersion. Take a look at the west, and then look at Africa and beyond. Would be rather difficult to fit names and army shadows in the smaller areas.

This is obviously why the classic map is that way we all know. It simply cant have all real countries.

[sully800]

I've also been thinking about a World Map instead of the classic map....one with a lot of countries compared to the classic map. However you can't include EVERY country you have on your map right now because as others said the playability would be terrible. Many of the smaller countries would need to be consolidated into larger ones....and some of the larger ones could possibly be broken up into smaller ones. But if you do that then you are on the path of literally recreating the classic map....so I don't know.

One thing to consider if you want to do this would be adding Antarctica.

[gavin_sidhu]

Error:You have east and west malalaysia as two different countries.

Good luck making this map.

Edit: Also alaska and the US.

[zim]

Thanks for the comments and suggestions, I think I'm going to give it a shot or at least take it a few steps further.

I've taken a stab at adding (114) army circles just to see if/how things would fit. Had to take a few liberties combining a few countries (please don't lose your mind/flame me if I merged your home land with an arch rival, etc., no socio-political intent on my part just trying for a workable circle fit) and splitting two (Indonesia in to several parts and Malaysia into Asian mainland and Bornean island parts), the goal was to remain as true to actual political geography as possible. I think the result is tight but workable with perhaps a few more creative mergers in Africa.



The continents aren't balanced in terms of number of territories (see list below) however they are not bad in terms of border counts and I think the territory disparities could be overcome by continent bonuses and perhaps some points for holding certain 'strategic' territories.

North America:
10 territories, 4 borders (Alaska, Greenland, Panama, Caribbean)

South America
12 territories, 5 borders (Columbia, Venezuela, Brazil, Tierra Del Feugo [two connections - South Africa and Fiji])

Africa
34 territories, 5 borders (South Africa [two connections - Australia and Tierra Del Feugo] , Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Somalia)

Europe
20 territories, 7 borders (Iceland, Spain, Corsica, Turkey, Ukraine, 'Baltics', Finland)

Asia
30 territories, 7 borders ('Holy Land', Syria, 'Caucasus', Russia [multiple connections Finland, 'Baltics' and Ukraine in the west and Alaska in the east), Yemen, 'Asian Malasia')

Oceania
8 Territories, 3 borders (Australia [by sea to South Africa], Fiji [by sea to Tierra Del Feugo], 'Sumatran Indonesia' [to 'Asian Malasia'])

What do you think?

[sully800]

Keep in mind that you still need to make the map smaller (and smaller once again for the small size!) and you currently don't have any country names on the map. The problem with small countries is usually not the army shadows but the name.

You are definitely going to have to consolidate small countries to fit the names in there.

[P Gizzle]

you could put numbers where the country's name usually is and then make a list of names. you would only have to do this for the small countries

[Herakilla]

i just wanna say that that is a s**tload od countries, and oddly, i like it! carry on then

[sully800]

you could put numbers where the country's name usually is and then make a list of names. you would only have to do this for the small countries

I think that would make things terribly hard to figure out and to pay attention where you're attacking.

Plus it would lead to a massive key.