Moderator: Community Team
freakshow wrote:Ok here something that I think we can all disagree on, or maybe we're all agreed, any way just to kick things off.
I find religion to be a totally pointless, infact quite harmful diversion. To begin with it's all complete BS. Instead of anwsering questions it simply leaves with you with harder unanwserable questions. It's devisive, exclusive, and often violent. More people have died in the name of religion than in WWII. I think that science is a much better alternative, it offers us the ability to come up with real anwsers to questions about who we are and why we are here, and it teaches us that no matter how diffrent we seem we are all connected and we have more incommon then we have diffrences. I have chosen in my life to abstain from as many religious things as possible, (although being a minor I don't have much choice sometimes).
Any way I'd love to hear your views on the topic, call me a heritic and what not if you will.
freakshow wrote:I think that science is a much better alternative, it offers us the ability to come up with real anwsers to questions about who we are and why we are here
lackattack wrote:This is the official Conquer Club policy on the matter and by continuing to use this website you hereby agree to believe in both science and religion.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
Fieryo wrote:there is nothing wrong with religion or science, that is until you add humanity to the mix. humans have the amazing ability to find conflict in most things, this thread is an example. why can people not just accept that not everyone believes the way they do? why can we not appreciate the fact that our own personal opinions are just that, our own?
Fieryo wrote:there is nothing wrong with religion or science, that is until you add humanity to the mix. humans have the amazing ability to find conflict in most things, this thread is an example.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
Phate wrote:everything has a cause.
Such reasoning is flawed. . .
If you cannot accept the universe existing without a creator 'causing' it, then what caused the creator to exist?
Phate wrote:
Such reasoning is flawed. . .
If you cannot accept the universe existing without a creator 'causing' it, then what caused the creator to exist?
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users