Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators
edbeard wrote:agreed with gimil that the colours tend to overlap around continent borders
I question the two territory +2 continent. especially when right next to it there's a four territory +3 where all four territories act as borders
I think it's a +1
Balsiefen wrote:Definatly +1, i would also say that a continent with 3 territs and 1 boarder should also only be a +1
Also you should get continent names up, so we know what we're talking about.

Ogrecrusher wrote:Balsiefen wrote:Definatly +1, i would also say that a continent with 3 territs and 1 boarder should also only be a +1
Also you should get continent names up, so we know what we're talking about.
Agreed.
Lone.prophet wrote:i think the font is to small and blends in to much with the green color
ZeakCytho wrote:It seems like the river comes out of the map rather than being set into it. I think this should be reversed.
The city emblem thing right by the title looks slightly odd. I can't really put my finger on what it is. I think it might be that it has no bevel/glow (not sure which it is) on the top and left sides like the legend, bonus box, and signature do. This makes it look really flat compared to everything else on the map. But it's still very bright and attention-grabbing, so if you were making it different to be subtle because it's not part of the map, that didn't really work. So I'd either do it in the same style as the other boxes or fade it a bit.
I think the title would look better if it were a few points larger.
I don't like the sharp contrast in the legend box between the regular background and the stuff the region names are on top of. Could you make the transition a bit more gradual, or add bevel or something similar to the continent-names box so it's more clearly a separate entity?
Ruben Cassar wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:It seems like the river comes out of the map rather than being set into it. I think this should be reversed.
The city emblem thing right by the title looks slightly odd. I can't really put my finger on what it is. I think it might be that it has no bevel/glow (not sure which it is) on the top and left sides like the legend, bonus box, and signature do. This makes it look really flat compared to everything else on the map. But it's still very bright and attention-grabbing, so if you were making it different to be subtle because it's not part of the map, that didn't really work. So I'd either do it in the same style as the other boxes or fade it a bit.
I think the title would look better if it were a few points larger.
I don't like the sharp contrast in the legend box between the regular background and the stuff the region names are on top of. Could you make the transition a bit more gradual, or add bevel or something similar to the continent-names box so it's more clearly a separate entity?
I have started working on all these points and should have already fixed 3 out of 4 for the next update.
However about the rivers...I gave them exactly the opposite effect that you are describing. Before they had bevel and were coming out of the map, now they have emboss are going into the map. I honestly don't know how to make them look any better in this sense.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Ruben Cassar wrote:However about the rivers...I gave them exactly the opposite effect that you are describing. Before they had bevel and were coming out of the map, now they have emboss are going into the map. I honestly don't know how to make them look any better in this sense.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest