Moderator: Community Team
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
lackattack wrote:* If you want the low rating blocks to have thresholds that each player can set, you better make a good argument for it. i dislike options and I prefer to keep things simple, optimal, and automatic
Bruceswar wrote:Take out that wall section. It will turn into nothing more than propaganda for players. That is unless you allow comments that are not so appealing to stand.
Bruceswar wrote:Player X will play player Y leave him 4's and 5's for all categories. Player Y leaves him all 1's. Then Player X joins another game with player Y just for the fact he wants to retaliate back and leave all 1's.
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
Optimus Prime wrote:Brucewar, I do believe the point of the ratings is to judge behavior and not gameplay from what I can see while reading through it.
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Player X will play player Y leave him 4's and 5's for all categories. Player Y leaves him all 1's. Then Player X joins another game with player Y just for the fact he wants to retaliate back and leave all 1's.
I would assume that there would be an option to only leave feedback for a person once. Kind of like the Pos/Neg right now, only one of each, and you can post neutrals....but people shouldn't be allowed to post multiple feedback for the same person.
Wow, longest post I've done in a long time Hope it makes sense....
The1exile wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Take out that wall section. It will turn into nothing more than propaganda for players. That is unless you allow comments that are not so appealing to stand.
I don't know about anyone else, but I was thinking of the wall as more of a self-moderated place for in-jokes and comments, rather than Serious Feedback With Really Important Capitalisation. It would be nice to get the joke negs on the wall while still getting an honest rating with no strings attached; anyone basing their opinion of the player of he wall is going to run the risk of being suckered by propagandists, but that's still a risk really with the current feedback system, isn't it?
Bruceswar wrote:The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Player X will play player Y leave him 4's and 5's for all categories. Player Y leaves him all 1's. Then Player X joins another game with player Y just for the fact he wants to retaliate back and leave all 1's.
I would assume that there would be an option to only leave feedback for a person once. Kind of like the Pos/Neg right now, only one of each, and you can post neutrals....but people shouldn't be allowed to post multiple feedback for the same person.
Wow, longest post I've done in a long time Hope it makes sense....
In Lack's post he says every time you play a player you will be able to rate them or "change your ratings" as he put it. This will allow for the problem I mentioned.
lackattack wrote:However, ratings are not tied to any particular game, so you can update an older rating for someone as your opinion changes over time (provided you complete more games with the member in question).
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Bruceswar wrote:The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Player X will play player Y leave him 4's and 5's for all categories. Player Y leaves him all 1's. Then Player X joins another game with player Y just for the fact he wants to retaliate back and leave all 1's.
I would assume that there would be an option to only leave feedback for a person once. Kind of like the Pos/Neg right now, only one of each, and you can post neutrals....but people shouldn't be allowed to post multiple feedback for the same person.
Wow, longest post I've done in a long time Hope it makes sense....
In Lack's post he says every time you play a player you will be able to rate them or "change your ratings" as he put it. This will allow for the problem I mentioned.lackattack wrote:However, ratings are not tied to any particular game, so you can update an older rating for someone as your opinion changes over time (provided you complete more games with the member in question).
If someone leaves you all low ratings, then most likely they won't want to play you again (for some time at least), and therefore you wouldn't really be able to alter them the way you are saying...I think. If you can only leave it after you play someone (on a game to game basis), maybe to prevent the cases you are talking about you should be limited to changing your rating of someone to once a month, or some other time frame?
SGUstickman wrote:A suggestion:
Feedback from other players can be valuable, but for attendance, I think that automatically compiled statistics would be a better choice.
What percentage of turns has a player missed? What percentage of games has a player been kicked for missing too many turns? These figures could be cumulative, or based on the last X number of games. I think this would be easier, more accurate, and less hassle than subjective reporting by individual players. Impossible to abuse, too!
Oops! Just noticed how old this thread is! Sorry 'bout that!
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:can I cash my 589 feedbacks in for 1,000 points.... lol !
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users