edbeard wrote:I'd say that's a good idea. You really only have three maps there though since Kyle just copied the one Telvannia posted. I forget the name of the guy who did it.
whitestazn88 wrote:Telvannia wrote:Personally i think if you are going to do an india map you should base it on this map, (which i always preferred)
where is this map from?
oaktown wrote:huh, I immediately thought it was the old Indian Presidencies map, which I really liked, but that's this one...
ZeakCytho wrote:I think it's a great first draft.
ZeakCytho wrote:I'm a bit hesitant to support rail-lines and city bonuses. For geographical maps like this, I think classic gameplay really works best. The whole thing might be less confusing if the rail lines looked like rail lines instead of just plain lines. Right now it's a bit hard to tell them apart from the territory borders. I think you also need to define "connect by rail" - do you mean "hold X cities and the territories between them that the rail goes over" (which I think you mean), or just "hold X cities"?
Users browsing this forum: degaston