Moderator: Cartographers
Incandenza wrote:I don't suppose Middle East style watermarks for the continents would be possible...
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
militant wrote:The map looks awesome, it looks nice and simple which is really good, it reminds me a little of the new Iceland map for the same reason. I am really liking the look of it. Nice one Lanyards
lanyards wrote:Canada is in America. Right?Joodoo wrote:Yukon is part of Canada, not USA.
Maybe you should make it North American Continents instead of American continents to make it more geographically correct.
Coleman wrote:I'm a bit confused by the ports being the same color as two corresponding continents instead of their own color. That's the only improvement I can see, as their being their own color would help further clarify that they are not a part of any existing continent.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
NO! Sorry, was being lazy. I'll work on it sometime soon.gimil wrote:*prods*
Whats going on lanyards? It also getting to the time I have to send this to the heap. You dont want that do you?
lanyards wrote:NO! Sorry, was being lazy. I'll work on it sometime soon.gimil wrote:*prods*
Whats going on lanyards? It also getting to the time I have to send this to the heap. You dont want that do you?
--lanyards
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
whitestazn88 wrote:did anyone notice that the colors have the exact same like... hue as the charleston map does?
Nope. Just being lazy. I'll get back to it soon.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I sure hope that this isn't dropped, I was really looking forward to this map.
lanyards wrote:cted a few territory names, and changed the style.
Most of the people commenting before I'm sure are long gone from here so maybe I'll be getting some new perspective
Is the new style the direction I should go or should I go back to the cool colors?
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users