lackattack wrote:Perhaps we add a browse link that opens up a popup window with all map thumbnails?
Why select all maps, when you can select none? Are the instructions not clear?if you have no preference for a particular criterion, just leave those boxes unchecked
max is gr8 wrote:I prefer tick boxes to be honest, I think the categorising would be the way to go, with the following:
"Geographical - Real World" - Classic
"Geographical - Fictitious" - Disc world
"Non-Geographical" - Dungeons of Draknor
"Classic Style" - USA (Simple Conquering)
"Simple Changes" - Asia (one use of the one way attack), USApocalypse (negative bonuses)
"Non-Classic Style" i.e. extreme game play changes (Circus Maximus, Draknor etc.)
"Feudal Style" (can't think of a proper name for it) - New World, AoR maps, Feudal War etc.
"Small Maps" - Doodle
"Large Maps" - World 2.1
"Current World" - Luxembourg
"Historic" - WWII
"Continental" - we have one for every continent except Australasia, and Antarctica
Rather than using difficulty level use the historic content. Possibly in future allow frequent map-makers to have their own tab, so Cairnswick could have a tab, as could Widow Maker
The Neon Peon wrote:The only reason people are complaining is because they actually have to think about the alphabet.
sully800 wrote:The only reason people are complaining is because people don't know how to use ctrl (and the lack of a gallery showing all maps at once.
I swear every other complaint is I can't select multiple maps or I can't deselect a map. This seems obvious to lack and others who are familiar with using ctrl in browsing files but I guess that is not a universal knowledge and needs more explanation.
Fuggazi wrote:The new game finder look really is stupid. Bloody ridiculous having to go through countless searches in order to find a few games to join. I will definitely not be renewing my subscription.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests