I never typified a tiebreaker policy as it never was necessary in Round 1 (though there were close calls). I'm going to say that higher-place-finishing is the tiebreaker. If that doesn't solve issues, a 1v1 match on an Egypt map of my choice (likely the one they both did worst at) with the tournament settings will be played for advancement.
Scores updated. Two groups have already been decided (one by finishing all 4 games fast as heck), while two remain up in the air. Gilligan, why am I not surprised you're in the group that hasn't finished anything yet?
TaCktiX wrote:You afforded them no mercy, joriki. Won all four games...
I also got the maximum difference of 9 points to everyone else That wasn't planned, though -- I didn't have the luxury of choosing whom to take out first in the last game, which was much closer than the others.
I just eliminated blue in the last game in the finals, for a total of at least 9 points, whereas the runner-up can get at most 8 points by winning the last game -- so I think that decides the tournament.