125 maps isn't a big errors.
I'm thinking that for someone is too usual to give critics to other and to spend few time on his problems.
Foundry is perfect perhaps a little bit frustrating, but if this is the price for a quality map i think that it's good.
But probably a jury is a bit too.
There's no way to create some referral figures that follow a map for every steps in foundry to help CA?
But they have to suggest/check not to judify.
In this case i could help
But, in my opinion, there's more important to fix in foundry process than understand if someone could or couldn't judify a map.
In foundry there too people that elect themself as supreme judges.
Please don't create another one.
But i'm agree with this possibility:
incadenza wrote:I'm kinda with ed. I see the jury concept as a "last looks", "get a few people together to see if there's anything obvious we missed" concept, as opposed to ultimate arbiters of a map's future.