Option for players to set, stake or bet points [REJECTED]

Suggestions that have not stood up to community review.

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Option for players to set, stake or bet points [REJECTED]

Postby Bull Dog on Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:22 pm

Mod Edit: The suggestion to allow players to set, stake or bet the amount of points that each player could lose to the winner has been suggested several times. It has also been REJECTED several times. Recently, MichelSableheart explained it well:

MichelSableheart wrote:The problem with this suggestion is that it doesn't respect the philosophy behind the current score system. Currently, scores are still somewhat indicative of ability, in the sense that if two players only play a certain type of game against each other, their points will reach a natural balance which reflects their ability. The same is true on a larger scale. The fact that most players vary the type of games they play makes the scoreboard less reliable, and abuse does take place, but the principle is still there. The fact that a players score won't grow higher at a certain point is part of that.

By giving players the option to play for a set amount of points, this natural balancing factor will disappear. You give up whatever indication of strength is there to change the system into a flat out race. Definately not a fan.


This thread contains many of these suggestions. If you want to suggest some variation of betting points, please catch up on the ideas history in this thread and the related threads that are mentioned below. If you see a thread that should be merged here, please inform a moderator. Thank you. --agentcom

Along the same lines, some users have suggested options to wager points in other ways. For example:

An option to make a game worth double the amount of points it would be worth otherwise - http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... &p=2721168
An option for a tournament "pot" - http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... &p=2983671
An option to gamble points on casino games - viewtopic.php?f=471&t=32961

This topic is also related to, but distinct from, the idea of having games worth no points, which has been rejected. In fact, if you were allowed to "stake" zero points, this suggestion would actually allow for these "unrated" games. That discussion is here: viewtopic.php?f=471&t=720


It would be a great idea if we could set the stakes (points) of the game. This way there would be more at risk if you lose or win.
Last edited by agentcom on Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:55 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Reason: changed title and added introduction
User avatar
Private 1st Class Bull Dog
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Sudbury

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:25 pm

Unfortunately you may be looking through CC with rose eyes. I could see a lot of abuse, multi's setting up games for easy points, when they can wager whatever they want.

Even if we limited it to say '60' point max, still abuse would be horrendous.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal AndyDufresne
Retired Administrator
 
Posts: 25044
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Medals: 20
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) General Achievement (4) General Contribution (2)

Postby dugcarr1 on Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:30 pm

maybe a doubling cube like backgammon,,,, with preuem only>
User avatar
Captain dugcarr1
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:44 am
Location: WEST COAST, CANADA

Postby Bull Dog on Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:37 pm

first u would have to earn the points before you can wager them. When you join you already start at 1000. Lets say you would need 1500 points before you can enter wagered games. never letting you bet your intial 1000 points. That would eliminate any multi's
User avatar
Private 1st Class Bull Dog
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Sudbury

Postby AK_iceman on Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:48 am

Bull Dog wrote:first u would have to earn the points before you can wager them. When you join you already start at 1000. Lets say you would need 1500 points before you can enter wagered games. never letting you bet your intial 1000 points. That would eliminate any multi's

Thats what you think... we have had quite a few multis who were colonels.. and even one guy who had 3 accounts in the top 5 of the scoreboard!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class AK_iceman
 
Posts: 5699
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (3)
General Contribution (2)

Postby Dlakavi on Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:44 pm

it is relytively easy to get to 1500 points, make 4 accounts of 1500, wager 500 in a game and make one general :)
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Dlakavi
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:45 am
Medals: 9
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1)

Postby Bull Dog on Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:10 pm

Is it that bad here to somebody would stoop so low. May be the first thing would be have some type of system to stop muti's.....there must be away.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Bull Dog
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Sudbury

Postby gulio on Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:24 pm

I don't think people should see what points are being wagered. I've been in games where the high point players take out the ^ and ? players first because they're scared of losing points.

Sometimes Points take the fun away. Most people > 1400 points will not play with a Single ^ or ? player because they're scared of losing points - fair enough.

I like playing with ? players because you get to teach them... I then like to play agaisnt ^^^'s or higher players to get my points back :lol:
User avatar
Corporal gulio
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:52 am
Location: BC, Canada
Medals: 9
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2)

Postby dugcarr1 on Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:38 pm

i think we should be able to gamble.... only on doubles games so there could never be cheeting
User avatar
Captain dugcarr1
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:44 am
Location: WEST COAST, CANADA

Postby P Gizzle on Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:51 pm

AK_iceman wrote:
Bull Dog wrote:first u would have to earn the points before you can wager them. When you join you already start at 1000. Lets say you would need 1500 points before you can enter wagered games. never letting you bet your intial 1000 points. That would eliminate any multi's

Thats what you think... we have had quite a few multis who were colonels.. and even one guy who had 3 accounts in the top 5 of the scoreboard!



who was that?!!
Gridiron Gang- CC's largest Clan!
User avatar
Cook P Gizzle
 
Posts: 4101
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere being absolutely AWESOME!
Medals: 1
Tournament Contribution (1)

Postby sully800 on Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:55 pm

dugcarr1 wrote:i think we should be able to gamble.... only on doubles games so there could never be cheeting


How would that prevent cheating?

You could use the exact same method described before. Create 4 accounts, have them all join a game, 2 win 999 points and are on the brink of being colonels instantly.

I think that betting points would completely open up the scoreboard to abuse. People are willing to go to great lengths to cheat and steal their way to large amounts of points (and some of those people ARE highly ranked). With a system this easy to abuse the scoreboard would become a joke.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (3) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (5)

Suggestion : Pink Slips!

Postby yeti_c on Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:29 am

* Suggestion Idea:

In racing circles there is a term called "pink slips" which basically means you race against each other and whoever wins takes the pink slips away with them. My idea is instead of winning/losing points based on current rank - you could bet an amount of points into the pot for a game and the winner takes all.

* Why it is needed:

I'm not sure if this is a good idea or not - but it popped into my head and I thought that I would let the public decide!!

* Priority** (1-5): ?
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Medals: 46
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (13) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (10)

Postby spiesr on Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:58 am

Sounds like it could really be abused...
User avatar
Lieutenant spiesr
Suggestions Moderator
Suggestions Moderator
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota
Medals: 23
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (5) General Contribution (2)

Postby yeti_c on Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:39 am

spiesr wrote:Sounds like it could really be abused...


Yeah my worries too!!

C.
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Medals: 46
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (13) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (10)

Postby AmericanEagle on Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:36 pm

that sounds kinda cool.

you could also just have the creator make the pot amount. that way you know what everyone else will have to bet as well.
Corporal AmericanEagle
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:10 pm

Next

Return to Rejected Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Login