Forum

by **Bruceswar** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:02 pm

Twill wrote:Man that was a long 24 hours, and easily the best (and then one of my worst) memories in the last 7 years of working with communities. It was an honour to work with you gents (those who read this), and sully, this is definitely a strong replacement.

It looks awesome!

(Oh boy it's odd to be posting in the forum again! )

HI Twill I bet you were frustrated that day!

by **Bruceswar** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:04 pm

P.S. Great news on the new map!!

by **azezzo** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:45 pm

a long time coming, i will be happy to give it a try, perhaps i can stop crying myself to sleep over the loss of the original.

by **nagerous** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:52 pm

Damn H.G Wells, once again he fails me.

by **AndyDufresne** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:05 pm

Finally glad to see a chance for a replacement that looks like it could be welcomed by the Community---and hopefully bring in new Conquer Club users as well.

Keep up the work folks. And always remember, go to the Foundry and get your voice heard. If you don't comment, participate, or at a minimum actively read, you may not end up with the desired output you want!

--Andy

by **jesusfreak16** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:15 pm

Maybe a stupid question but, I was wondering, could we like keep the current one, but just rename it?

by **jako** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:26 pm

Looking forward to the new classic map. It looks outstanding. Great job sully. =D>

by **mibi** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:48 pm

huzzah! I have only players a handful of classic games since it got shape-ified. Can't wait to rock and roll on the new classic.

by **mpjh** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:17 pm

Actually, we teach on the shapes map and play a ton of games on it at SOC -- if we could keep it for teaching, it would be helpful.

by **Bruceswar** on Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:35 pm

mpjh wrote:Actually, we teach on the shapes map and play a ton of games on it at SOC -- if we could keep it for teaching, it would be helpful.

I agree keep all 3... It works very well with the 2 now. This one will take top spot, but the other should be kept. I am just getting to know all the names on Classic Art!

by **Mr Changsha** on Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:29 am

I think they should remove shapes and art. I'd like to get all my classic games back under 1 stat. Already have a split on shapes (which includes the old classic game), then art, if we then add a third, then I am stuck with what is in all the essentials the same game split over three maps. It may be a 'nerd's opinion'..but you see if I care!

Beyond that, shapes has always looked like hell and art, to my mind, also looks like it was knocked up over a working lunch with a few good bottles of wine. Neither are anywhere near the quality the CC Community has come to expect.

by **LFAW** on Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:36 am

I second Changsha.

by **MrBenn** on Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:46 am

Just to clarify, it is only Classic Shapes that is being revamped and replaced. Classic Art will remain alongside the new Classic - at least in the short term.

by **Mr Changsha** on Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:48 am

MrBenn wrote:Just to clarify, it is only Classic Shapes that is being revamped and replaced. Classic Art will remain alongside the new Classic - at least in the short term.

Seriously, why and on what basis? Once we have a decent classic back, what's the point of 'art'? It is bloody annoying for team games (assuming you and your team are not lovers of art history), looks like hell and, as it has the same gameplay as the 'new classic'...get rid of it!