Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
lt_oddball wrote:Artesie (6-2) = 4
Kroon Vlaanderen (10-4) = 6
Kortrijk (5-1)= 4
Brabant (3-1) = 2
Vier Ambachten 2
Rijks Vlaanderen (3-1) = 2
Oostervant (3-1) = 2
(substracted autodeploy goes without saying).
Symmetry wrote:The big sea route could be shorter too. I'd say remove it entirely unless you break up the territories.
DubWarrior wrote:This sea-link was an idea to link 2 'ends' on the map with eachother. If it's impossible for a player to cross the map, some good action can be taken in that way, by using this connection. it's just a very small detail, and can be easily removed from the map.
RedBaron0 wrote:And what about the rebel strongholds? Will they start as neutral?
Symmetry wrote:Some of those territories can be broken down. Maybe a break between Gent and Flanders on the Eeklo/ Roesclare border? Or Roesclare/Ieper
French territories could be broken up too. The Bethune/ Terwaan border maybe?
DubWarrior wrote:So what is next? Their isn't much reply on this update...means it it fine? Do I need to ask a mod for a new stamp or not?
lt_oddball wrote:Added Zierikzee (Flanders? ) is good idea.
DubWarrior wrote:Hmmm, strong point...very true. I first did the rivers, and in a later version I did the +2 bonus. So I didn't correct it afterwards.
With Castles you mean Ieper and Gent? or connect all capitals with Brugge, like some sort of trade-rout?
looks like a serious decision to me... any options?
Wouldn't it be enough to link Ieper and Eeklo with Brugge?
pamoa wrote:I know you already put a lot of work in this map and the result is great
my suggestions and remarks
your towers are so plain I'm sure you can give us a more sexy design, more in tone with the theme with some battlements
the lion in Brugge is very blurry
river around Brugge Kortijk and Gent is pixelised
I would put some frame around your bonus graphic legend
I really miss the drawing you had in version 3
I hope it will help you going on
DubWarrior wrote:-The legend is a bit 'naked' now, true...Maybe a very small border, or extra parchment?
-Most important: You miss the drawing of version 3...? what exactly? everything, or the legend? On what point it was better. I always thought it was a good version, but then we did the darker version...
DubWarrior wrote:It is pretty strange. I made the map in Photoshop en added text in Illustrator. I opened it back in Photoshop to save it as a good jpg, and it is always saved a bit blurry. Any advice? (I made the map on a 300dpi, and scaled it at the end to 72dpi. I use a JPG 12 compresion 'Progression'.
Users browsing this forum: agentcom