[Rules] [GP] Neutralize Territories if team member is kicked

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Postby AAFitz on Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:42 pm

the best solution would be if the other person could simply take the turn of that person...but im pretty sure thats complicated
User avatar
Captain AAFitz
 
Posts: 7262
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1
Medals: 85
Monthly Leader Bronze (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (2)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3)
Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (8) General Achievement (2)
Clan Achievement (8) Tournament Contribution (8) General Contribution (2)

Postby Arbotross on Fri Mar 07, 2008 6:25 pm

they are already penalized, by deadbeating they miss 3 turns of troops and chances to attack and such, and beyond that they miss about 3 armies a turn
Corporal 1st Class Arbotross
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:47 pm
Medals: 14
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1)

Postby DaGip on Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:38 pm

Night Strike wrote:It was put in place to help protect the player who has a random person join on his team but then deadbeat.

The true question (and what could probably be fairly debated) would be if it's still necessary since new recruits aren't allowed to play team games.


When I first started, I joined a dubls game and didn't even realize it. I attacked the shit out of my partner! Funny he didn't say anything to me about it?

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?gam ... full_log=Y

I was such a n00b!

I was even trying to talk to Gigfood while in team chat and didn't even realize it! CC was a big big world and I was but an ignorant child.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant DaGip
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota
Medals: 20
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (2)
Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3)

Postby superkarn on Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:08 am

AAFitz wrote:the best solution would be if the other person could simply take the turn of that person...but im pretty sure thats complicated

If you like that idea, check this thread out: 2-player "team" games.
It's about a new game type that is similar to what you suggested (1 player playing multiple colors).
User avatar
Lieutenant superkarn
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:11 am
Location: Clearwater
Medals: 9
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)

booted teammate shouldn't be reward

Postby jenkin on Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:09 pm

While playing a close doubles match with three teams. two teams had one player left and one had both. One of the players from the team with two players was booted for missing too many turns. that is a good device to have. What was bad was when his territories and his cards went to his teammate. Giving him a clear advantage over the rest of the players at a very important part of the game, essentially ending it and winning it for him.
I suggest that all assets of players booted for missing too many turns should turn neutral rather than become the teams. I understand that it is annoying to have a bad teammate, but that is part of risk playing with a random team.

Thank You.


Concise description:
  • xxxxxxx

Specifics:
  • xxxxxxx

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • xxxxxxx (you can obviously delete this for bug reports)
  • xxxxxxx
User avatar
Corporal jenkin
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:02 am
Medals: 1
Ratings Achievement (1)

Re: booted teammate shouldn't be reward

Postby owenshooter on Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:03 pm

this was just added recently, and i doubt they will go back to changing the booted players armies into neutrals. it is the fault of all of you in the game for not attacking the player missing turns and limiting his numbers. in the rules, it states that his armies will become his teammates, so why weren't you all taking care of what was the obvious problem. sounds like bad play to me, not a bad rule.-0
Image
DoomYoshi, "GD has no traffic because of venereal diseases like you."
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 10197
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (2)

Re: booted teammate shouldn't be reward

Postby Keebs2674 on Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:30 pm

I think the rules should stay as they are.

However, I don't know what the rules are as far as point distribution at the end are. I think if your teamate(s) deadbeat and you go on to win the game, the deadbeats shouldn't get any points. Again, I don't know whether this is the case already or not (hopefully it is). Deadbeats are lame.
Captain Keebs2674
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:48 am
Medals: 21
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)

Re: booted teammate shouldn't be reward

Postby jenkin on Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:56 am

the armies going to the teammate I don't have a problem with it's the spoils, the cards that can give an unfair advantage to that team.
User avatar
Corporal jenkin
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:02 am
Medals: 1
Ratings Achievement (1)

Re: booted teammate shouldn't be reward

Postby rishaed on Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:20 am

i had a game sorta like this and the thing is you have three turns to wipe him or his teamate gets everything...sometimes you just don't have enough troops or time to wipe him.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rishaed
 
Posts: 772
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Foundry forums looking for whats going on!
Medals: 17
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (1) General Achievement (4)

[Rules] Neutralize Territories if team member is kicked

Postby Fridayknight on Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:42 am

MOD EDIT: There have been at least a few suggestions on how to deal with the perceived problem of users who get kicked out of team games and what to do with their spoils, troops and territories. While none of the following three suggestions are entirely clear on the mechanics of what the solution to this problem should be, they all derive from the same source and arrive at similar conclusions.

The following three suggestions have been MERGED and REJECTED.

12/8/2009: Fridayknight says that we should "have a look" at the the deadbeat problem.

5/30/11 gumby7524 says that when a teammate deadbeats the rest of the team "should suffer as much as the other teams have suffered"

11/4/12: chewie1 says that in the case of a deadbeat or rules violation that it "become like in terminator games where [cards and territs are still up fo[r] grabs ... or just become straight neutrals"

The current system that is in place attempts to not punish innocent victims of the deadbeating or rules violations whether they be teammates or opponents of the deadbeat or violator. If someone is taking advantage of these rules, then you are free to fill out a Cheating and Abuse Report to address the problem. But for now, the rarity of the perceived problem and the amount of effort that would go in to "fixing" it means that it's not likely that this system will change.

As yeti_c points out:

yeti_c wrote:
If you can't kill of a team that is only playing half of the time in 3 goes - then you shouldn't bother playing... or you were going to lose anyway.

C.


But perhaps there is a solution to be found here:

1/15/10: karelpietertje says that in the case of a rules violation, the teammates should simply take over and "play[] for the busted player"

Unlike the first three mentioned suggestions, Karel's suggestion has been Submitted and is probably the only avenue that is likely to be taken by CC.

If you see any other suggestions that should be merged here, please post in the thread or inform a moderator. Thanks, as always, for reading --agentcom]


Concise description:
    I've encountered a couple of instances where I've played in games where one team is clearly about to lose but because of a technicality in the game it works out to be a great benefit for one of the teams. One of the team members in a doubles match is kicked for missing too many turns but his teammate gains all his spoils and territories? Seems hardly fair and a very cheap tactic for someone to tip the scales in their favor.

Specifics:
    For instance in Game 5840836. My teammate and I were on the verge of victory and only had to eliminate one player since his teammate was about to be kicked for missing too many turns. He had about 3 territories left at the time. I didn't realize this at the time but he inherited all his partners territories and then was able to run the table with the spoils and bonuses and win the game the very next turn.

    Game 5815723

    Once again... a poor player being rewarded for his teammates lack of play. The blue player has inherited quite a bit and in my opinion would've been wiped out in the near future if this was not part of the game. Now he's sitting pretty and can pretty much run the gambit with his re-enforcements that he'll be getting.

Please have a look into this and let me know what, if anything is being done.

Thanks in advance
Last edited by JamesKer1 on Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: created introduction
Corporal Fridayknight
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:07 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Medals: 6
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby TheForgivenOne on Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:25 am

Yeah, but take into account, when multi's are kicked out. I was in a quads game, round 2, when all 3 of my parters were kicked out for being multi's, making it 4v1. So how is it exactly fair to me? I barely managed to win the game. If your rule was applied, then it makes unfair to those who lose their partner(s) to violating the rules. Because i got stuck with a dumbass, i lose points automatically, having no chance at all. It would be as if i was in a 5 way ffa, and my 4 opponents teamed up on me at a very early stage of the game.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5170
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Medals: 83
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (7)
General Contribution (11)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby TheScarecrow on Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:34 am

its rather unfair on the player you mentioned. is it HIS/HER fault the other player got kicked out?

why should that player who is left alone be faced against a team of two players with only half the territories?

for 3 whole turns his/her team was not getting their full complement of armies - that is punishment enough.

i am also somewhat amazed. this happened to you before and you had not learned anything? :roll: break the bonus(es) of the player about to be kicked as well as those auto-deploy territories.

you are also forgetting that when his/her team mate is being kicked he/she loses the 3 armies/turn automatic deploy.


the whole point is:

Why should Player A be punished because his team mate Player B missed 3 turns?
User avatar
Cook TheScarecrow
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:41 am
Medals: 3
Standard Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby jammyjames on Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:55 am

TheForgivenOne wrote:Yeah, but take into account, when multi's are kicked out. I was in a quads game, round 2, when all 3 of my parters were kicked out for being multi's, making it 4v1. So how is it exactly fair to me? I barely managed to win the game. If your rule was applied, then it makes unfair to those who lose their partner(s) to violating the rules. Because i got stuck with a dumbass, i lose points automatically, having no chance at all. It would be as if i was in a 5 way ffa, and my 4 opponents teamed up on me at a very early stage of the game.



dont get a retarded team that will all be kicked out then... i preferred it the way it used to be.. if a teamate was kicked they went neutral... it becomes a huge advantage in some games when a teamate is kicked...
Image
Sergeant 1st Class jammyjames
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 am
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (4)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby Fridayknight on Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:25 pm

TheForgivenOne wrote:Yeah, but take into account, when multi's are kicked out. I was in a quads game, round 2, when all 3 of my parters were kicked out for being multi's, making it 4v1. So how is it exactly fair to me? I barely managed to win the game. If your rule was applied, then it makes unfair to those who lose their partner(s) to violating the rules. Because i got stuck with a dumbass, i lose points automatically, having no chance at all. It would be as if i was in a 5 way ffa, and my 4 opponents teamed up on me at a very early stage of the game.


That is an extreme example of how it would work against you and highly unlikely to happen all that often.

My point is why should you get all your teammate's territories and spoils? You did nothing to earn them. Those on the opposing team(s) lose a lot by rolling the dice, losing troops and putting you into those positions. Because your teammate(s) cannot fulfill their end of the bargain should not validate why you should be awarded for their incompetence. I'm saying turn all the territories into neutral territories and no one gets them.
Corporal Fridayknight
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:07 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Medals: 6
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby Fridayknight on Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:27 pm

TheScarecrow wrote:its rather unfair on the player you mentioned. is it HIS/HER fault the other player got kicked out?

why should that player who is left alone be faced against a team of two players with only half the territories?

for 3 whole turns his/her team was not getting their full complement of armies - that is punishment enough.

i am also somewhat amazed. this happened to you before and you had not learned anything? :roll: break the bonus(es) of the player about to be kicked as well as those auto-deploy territories.

you are also forgetting that when his/her team mate is being kicked he/she loses the 3 armies/turn automatic deploy.


the whole point is:

Why should Player A be punished because his team mate Player B missed 3 turns?


Read my previous post...
Corporal Fridayknight
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:07 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Medals: 6
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby The Neon Peon on Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:41 pm

Pretty much you are saying, is if you have a crappy teammate that doesn't take his turns, your team should lose. That is basically what this suggestion is.

The only time it benefits to have this happen is in the only example you gave: your team goes for a kill, then that person inherits the territories of the deadbeat.

In all other cases
- the other team now has back to back turns.
- if the person that deatbeated had less than 9 territories, the team now earns less troops
- if the person who received the territories had less than 9 territories, the team now earns less troops
- the team already lost at least 9 troops because the person was not taking their turns to deploy them
- all the armies of the deatbeat were useless for 3 rounds and never attacked anything
- the team has been playing with one less player for 3 rounds before receiving any compensation for it
- etc. etc.

Having a teammate that deadbeats is terrible. You lose a whole lot of initiative and your chances at winning the game are far slimmer, you have to rely on the other team being bad or having good dice. The rules are this way so that the team might actually have a chance at winning.
User avatar
Lieutenant The Neon Peon
 
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (3)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby TheForgivenOne on Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:32 am

jammyjames wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:Yeah, but take into account, when multi's are kicked out. I was in a quads game, round 2, when all 3 of my parters were kicked out for being multi's, making it 4v1. So how is it exactly fair to me? I barely managed to win the game. If your rule was applied, then it makes unfair to those who lose their partner(s) to violating the rules. Because i got stuck with a dumbass, i lose points automatically, having no chance at all. It would be as if i was in a 5 way ffa, and my 4 opponents teamed up on me at a very early stage of the game.



dont get a retarded team that will all be kicked out then... i preferred it the way it used to be.. if a teamate was kicked they went neutral... it becomes a huge advantage in some games when a teamate is kicked...


lmao thanks james, because i totally meant to pick a retard. That was my goal in that game. Even though not really my fault, because he joined my team. When i first joined the game, it was a Cadet on Team 1, and nobody on team 2. I joined team 2. Team 1 filled up late at night, and i had no parters. I wake up, the game has started. So it's not really my fault at all now is it? I actually felt like the game should be stricken from the records, and no points are gained/lost in that extreme situation. but thats just me
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5170
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Medals: 83
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (7)
General Contribution (11)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby Choco on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:37 pm

If you lose your partner and all his territories your chance to win the game goes from bad to almost impossible. You've already lost 9 armies on the behalf of your partner, if you lose all other territories to neutrals not only do you lose friendly armies, you gain blockers on the bonuses you want.

This is an unfair suggestion, and only helps out the opposition.
CC is not about making it easy for higher ranked players or players that get "lucky" and get a partner that gets kicked - it's about being as fair as possible to all participants.

So, a tip to you that complain - kill territories of players that are missing turns in team games. This is the only way to kill the "advantage", and it's completely fair.
Sergeant Choco
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:40 pm
Medals: 24
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby max is gr8 on Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:48 pm

Anyway it used to be like this. Because of such there will be no U-Turn, like with the double turn freestyles. It was originally an option then it was eradicated step by step.

Consider this the deadbeat version of surrender
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
User avatar
Corporal max is gr8
 
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:44 am
Location: In a big ball of light sent from the future
Medals: 33
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (11)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby stahrgazer on Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:59 pm

I think a happy medium would benefit; a change so that only a random half of the kicked player's terrs go to other teammates. That gives someone whose teammate deadbeats at least a fighting chance, while minimizing the temptation for a teammate to deadbeat so the team can win the game.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1424
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 57
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Bot Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (8)
Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (7)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby jefjef on Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:36 pm

This is a good idea. No reason to potentially reward a team for having a deadbeat or a cheat as a team mate.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6007
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass
Medals: 49
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (11)
Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby yeti_c on Sun Dec 13, 2009 7:06 pm

Completely disagree...

If you can't kill of a team that is only playing half of the time in 3 goes - then you shouldn't bother playing... or you were going to lose anyway.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Medals: 48
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (13) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (10)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby Keebs2674 on Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:52 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Pretty much you are saying, is if you have a crappy teammate that doesn't take his turns, your team should lose. That is basically what this suggestion is.

The only time it benefits to have this happen is in the only example you gave: your team goes for a kill, then that person inherits the territories of the deadbeat.

In all other cases
- the other team now has back to back turns.
- if the person that deatbeated had less than 9 territories, the team now earns less troops
- if the person who received the territories had less than 9 territories, the team now earns less troops
- the team already lost at least 9 troops because the person was not taking their turns to deploy them
- all the armies of the deatbeat were useless for 3 rounds and never attacked anything
- the team has been playing with one less player for 3 rounds before receiving any compensation for it
- etc. etc.

Having a teammate that deadbeats is terrible. You lose a whole lot of initiative and your chances at winning the game are far slimmer, you have to rely on the other team being bad or having good dice. The rules are this way so that the team might actually have a chance at winning.


Well said. I agree, this is a bad idea. The only way I could see it making sense is if people actually chose their teammates in all games, which they don't.
Captain Keebs2674
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:48 am
Medals: 21
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)

Re: Suggestion: Territories go neutral if team member is kicked

Postby colton24 on Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:02 pm

Fridayknight wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:Yeah, but take into account, when multi's are kicked out. I was in a quads game, round 2, when all 3 of my parters were kicked out for being multi's, making it 4v1. So how is it exactly fair to me? I barely managed to win the game. If your rule was applied, then it makes unfair to those who lose their partner(s) to violating the rules. Because i got stuck with a dumbass, i lose points automatically, having no chance at all. It would be as if i was in a 5 way ffa, and my 4 opponents teamed up on me at a very early stage of the game.


That is an extreme example of how it would work against you and highly unlikely to happen all that often.

My point is why should you get all your teammate's territories and spoils? You did nothing to earn them. Those on the opposing team(s) lose a lot by rolling the dice, losing troops and putting you into those positions. Because your teammate(s) cannot fulfill their end of the bargain should not validate why you should be awarded for their incompetence. I'm saying turn all the territories into neutral territories and no one gets them.

Actually he won that game. I mean this should be rejected. Why make the other player suffer and lose points for his teammates problem. This is a BAD idea
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed :mrgreen:

One fool reporting for duty!

Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
User avatar
Lieutenant colton24
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:27 am
Location: Alabama
Medals: 24
Most Improved Bronze (1) Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) General Achievement (2) Training Achievement (1)
Tournament Contribution (3)

Team member inheriting spoils

Postby Gumby1 on Mon May 30, 2011 8:35 am

Hello,

I haven't been able to find a post in regards to this topic. I am currently playing in a game: 9052575. It is a four team, two player per team game of North America. Spoils are escalating.

We are now in Round 7. Team 1, second player: ccockatoo, played the first three rounds, taking a spoil on each turn. He then sat out rounds 4 to 6 and was therefore kicked out of the game. What I don't understand is that now is teammate has inherited his spoils (he is now sitting at 6 spoils) and is set to run the board on his next turn.

Why is it that when somebody is kicked out for non playing (which makes the game boring for everyone else), his teammate is rewarded with his spoils. In my opinion this is cheating. The other teams cannot adjust to this "strategy" because we never saw it coming. I would go so far as to say that it was cheating.

Team 1 set the game up and I suspect that this was a tactic that they had talked about privately. Player: Larry46, and his partner: ccockatoo, stand to win the game on this highly controversial "strategy". I believe that it is unfair.

If your partner is kicked out for non play, then you should suffer as much as the other teams have suffered. You should not benefit and win the game.

This is just my humble opinion.

Regards,
gumby7524
User avatar
Lieutenant Gumby1
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: Toronto
Medals: 45
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2)

PreviousNext

Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login