Forum

by **yeti_c** on Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:51 am

This thread viewtopic.php?f=4&t=105391

Needs to merge into here.

C.

by **Beckytheblondie** on Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:31 pm

YAY! Becky is 34 of 35 on this map and has eclipsed the +500 point mark. A Feudal Epic master already??

by **MrBenn** on Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:14 pm

Other than the initial slip-up with the neutrals, are there any proposed amendments to be made?

by **yeti_c** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:30 am

MrBenn wrote:Other than the initial slip-up with the neutrals, are there any proposed amendments to be made?

Can't see any.

C.

by **Rakio** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:34 am

Clan Rhu is the only kingdom that cannot have 6 terrs + a neutral terr to bombard and a way out?
Im concerned about Rhu 1 in no spoils game.

Maybe this "issue" have been addressed already, if so apologizes on my behalf.

by **GoranZ** on Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:29 pm

I wonder why there are only 3(total 6) neutrals per bridge(5 per bridge side is much more appropriate), and why Warlords and Rebel are doomed to fail(4 neutrals on both side of any bridge)... For them its a game of luck but NOT STRATEGY GAME...

just my 2 cents

by **yeti_c** on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:07 pm

Can we have a Feudal Epic map with the neutrals overlaid please?

C.

by **the.killing.44** on Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:54 pm

gim is back, and the XML is finished.

http://h1.ripway.com/killing44/Feudal.xml

gim also made new images with different Warlords 4 number placement:
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/G ... picS-6.png
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/G ... picL-5.png

Forward these on to lack, danke.

by **MrBenn** on Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:20 pm

Is that new images AND new XML?

by **the.killing.44** on Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:48 pm

MrBenn wrote:Is that new images AND new XML?

Yessir.

by **iancanton** on Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:55 am

the.killing.44 wrote:gim is back, and the XML is finished.

http://h1.ripway.com/killing44/Feudal.xml
- Warlords 4 coords fixed
-all bridge neutrals corrected

bridge neutrals corrected? what was wrong with them? i can't see the xml in ripway now.

ian.

by **the.killing.44** on Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:28 am

iancanton wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:gim is back, and the XML is finished.

http://h1.ripway.com/killing44/Feudal.xml
- Warlords 4 coords fixed
-all bridge neutrals corrected

bridge neutrals corrected? what was wrong with them? i can't see the xml in ripway now.

ian.

Ugh, ripway fails. I'll reupload somewhere else, but it'll probably be a while…

The bridge neutrals weren't uniform.

by **GabonX** on Sun Feb 14, 2010 3:49 pm

Great work..

I think you may have surpassed the quality of the original.

by **iancanton** on Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:32 am

the.killing.44 wrote:The bridge neutrals weren't uniform.

not all bridge neutrals are supposed to be n3. if i recall correctly, gah 6 and tri 7 are both deliberately n2 to reduce the isolation of feudal empire and warlords. the n1 on xeu 10 does look wrong though, since it connects to gah 1, which is an n3.

ian.

by **natty dread** on Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:40 pm

Sorry but I don't get that impassable between great kingdom 7 and great kingdom 4. It looks like a patch of grass, which makes it kinda confusing. I didn't even notice it at first. Wouldn't a small lake or mountain be better, or a wall or something?