Moderator: Community Team
Culs De Sac wrote:Ahunda, as I stated..that appeared to be the prominent argument.. I used the worlds "elite" since hopscotcher used it..
I clearly stated that it is merely the addition of an Option and Only an option.
I just feel that the debate on hand is pointless..as I also stated, no matter the settings, people will ALWAYS B$tch and moan
I hate manual..avoid it unless manual deployment is pointless like on aor, feudal and so forth, because i want the medal, but otherwise, this option can be avoided just like any other...
its a business, Supply and Demand, and it appears that the Demand is high..
We pay for premium and hence if premiums ask for it, and its within the realm of possibility..Then it should be granted...
What happened to the "customer is always right"?
Timminz wrote:Hopscotcher wrote:Consider what you are saying yes to:
You are saying it would be alright for one player to take more than one spot in a game.
No we aren't. This is a very specific suggestion, and the majority of supporters do not want what you are so worried about. I totally agree with you, in that I don't think there should ever be an option to allow one player to take more than one spot in a regular team game. It would wreak havoc on team games as they are (and should remain). If, for example, I could join a quads game (against four separate players), and play as all four of the other team, I would be able to put my score through the roof. Not only would I be more likely to win (due to not having to coordinate with others), but the point reward would be 4 times as high as it would be if I had 3 team mates. THAT would be an absolutely horrible option to have, but that is NOT what we want.
Hopscotcher wrote:Consider what you are saying yes to:
You are saying it would be alright for one player to take more than one spot in a game.
Hopscotcher wrote:Once you allow this, no matter if it is for 1 v 1 or any other format, it becomes a slippery slope.
Also consider the idea that this might be used in CLA or Clan Matchups.
Hopscotcher wrote:The idea in and of itself is simply.............. wrong. I think opening the door to this is akin to opening the door to a bloodthirsty vampire. Once he gets his toe in, he'll just keep wanting more until he sucks the life out of the site.
mattattam wrote:I think this is a great idea that opens up a number of possibilities. If someone doesn't like it they can simply not play this game type. There you go
jackal31 wrote:this is the first i've had a chance to look at it and i think it would be great but only if it were restricted to 1v1. Team games are just that....TEAM GAMES.....you have to rely on your team to do well and learn to communicate with them.
On the other hand, if you were trying to learn strategy on a new map and didnt want to lose points in the process, then a game against yourself would be beneficial.
so my vote is YES for 1v1 ......
and NO for everything else.....
mattattam wrote:that wont be an option though if you create a game with 4 different players and then one person joins the other team and invites him/herself for the whole team.....then team 1 just got screwed (essentially)
FarangDemon wrote:1) A team game will be either like original doubs, trips, quads (all unique players)
2) A team game will be 1v1 doubs, trips, quads (1 player controls all players)
Chuuuuck wrote:I think the whole idea is great. I think players should even be allowed to take on a team. 1 vs 4.
If they do this then they lose points for every slot they take up or they gain points for every slot they take up. I personally would play it some that way but I wouldn't mind being on the other side of things because I would think 4 of us could come up with more ideas than that 1 person.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users