Conquer Club

New "Intensity Cubes"

Archival storage for Announcements. Peruse old Announcements here!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby lackattack on Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 am

We haven't touched the dice... erm, intensity cubes since February 14, 2006 because they were pretty darn random (see here). However, thanks to some prodding and advice from Dako, sherkaner and jakewilliams I became convinced that it is worthwhile to make some alterations.

This is how the intensity cubes now work:
  • We have a series of 50,000 high quality random numbers from random.org
  • Each time the game engine generates a random intensity cube, the next number is read in sequence from the series (e.g. in a 3v1 attack 4 numbers are read sequentially)
  • When the last number in the series is read, we "rewind" and continue with the first number in the series

The advantages are twofold:
  • Each individual number in the series is used for both attacker and defender, so our intensity cubes cannot be biased for either side.
  • The series is stored in memory so the dice perform much faster. This makes a huge difference when auto-assault is used with large numbers of troops on both sides.

An interesting note - as of June 2010 Conquer Club processes 1,000,000 assaults each day!
User avatar
Sergeant lackattack
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Optimus Prime on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:16 pm

I'm not understanding how it works differently from before. Any chance of further clarification?
User avatar
Cadet Optimus Prime
 
Posts: 9665
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:33 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby lackattack on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:23 pm

Sure, before it worked like this:

The intensity levels are based on high quality random numbers from Random.org. The numbers are read from a large file containing columns of numbers from 1 to 6, in the format A1 A2 A3 D1 D2. When the intensity levels are generated, the game engine reads a line from the file and discards it. The appropriate numbers are used and the others are ignored. The file contains 500,000 lines of intensity levels and is re-loaded when all the lines are used up.
User avatar
Sergeant lackattack
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Dako on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:25 pm

Wow, that was rather quick. Too bad I don't have a stacking game to test out 10k attack.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby lord voldemort on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:25 pm

*head explodes*
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Dako on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:26 pm

By the way, on the Home page feed (right column) the quotes are escaped to " :D.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Ace Rimmer on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:47 pm

Optimus Prime wrote:I'm not understanding how it works differently from before. Any chance of further clarification?


I'll try to help

Old format:

500k lines each with 5 random numbers. The first 3 are attacker, last 2 defender. When you roll, it pulled a line from list and dropped any attacker/defender dice that weren't needed. For example, if you rolled a 2v1 it would drop the last attacker and last defender. When it reached roll 500k, it would start back at line 1

example:

6 4 5 2 1
4 6 1 6 6
3 4 3 2 3

New format:

50k numbers between 1 and 6 (inclusive) in random order. Now it pulls the number of rolls needed from the file without discarding any. This makes it "more" random because there is no duplication and all the numbers are used (none are discarded). After those 50k are used, a new batch of 50k random numbers is retrieved from random.org

example:

6 4 5 2 1 4 6 1 6 6 3 4 3 2 3

Hope this helps.
Jake
Last edited by Ace Rimmer on Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Lieutenant Ace Rimmer
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:22 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby TheSaxlad on Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:50 pm

nice...

EDIT: Actually Take That Back, I just lost 9v1...
User avatar
Corporal TheSaxlad
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:42 am
Location: ShakeyCat's Saxland :)

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby musicalmaven on Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:19 pm

not that i fully understand the change (the term "intensity cubes" means nothing to me), but i can always be hopefull that this will help change my luck.
as a person who has kept track of all my wins and loses from all my attacks for over 2 years, and have the numbers to show that the dice were never good to me, i can only hope this will get me back to average.
and to give it a clean slate, i'll start a new sheet and see how good or bad my results are with the new dice system.
i will let you guys know the results, after a reasonable length of time.
Lieutenant musicalmaven
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:08 am
2

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby TheForgivenOne on Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:43 pm

Nice. I was secretly hoping the little bunnies with the cards that would pop up got put through 8-[
Image
Game 1675072
2018-08-09 16:02:06 - Mageplunka69: its jamaica map and TFO that keep me on this site
User avatar
Major TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5994
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby jammyjames on Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:20 pm

TheForgivenOne wrote:Nice. I was secretly hoping the little bunnies with the cards that would pop up got put through 8-[


Yeah i was thinking that when i read it :lol: :cry:
Image
Corporal 1st Class jammyjames
 
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 am

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby qwertylpc on Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:41 pm

i have both dice analyzer and dice streaks and my dice just took a turn for the worse go back please

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=7177849 http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=7178880 they sucked :oops:
-qwertylpc :D 8-) :lol:

My active tournaments looking for players
Q's "Hey you went first!"
Q's 1v1 NBA Playoffs
Q's Feudal Overlord

Game 9151351
Most Consecutive Troops Defeated 0
Most Consecutive Troops Lost 14
User avatar
Major qwertylpc
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:12 pm
Location: In front of a computer somewhere out there in the universe

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Lindax on Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:58 pm

Dako wrote:Wow, that was rather quick. Too bad I don't have a stacking game to test out 10k attack.


Sure sounds good lack.

Dako: I have some nice stacks I can try it out with, gives me an excuse to attack, lol

Lx
"Winning Solves Everything" - Graeko
User avatar
Major Lindax
Tournament Director
Tournament Director
 
Posts: 10975
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: Paradise Rediscovered

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Bruceswar on Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:03 pm

hmm lets see how this goes over a week or so. I will report back with my findings. Looks like it is time to total rethink how I play CC.


Here was a first test... 64(Attacking) vs 600.... Which stopped at 3 vs 503 What I did notice right off the bat is lots of streaks.

show: Dice
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby wisemanpsemc on Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:32 pm

I thought something was different in my attacks today. Now it makes sense. Hopefully this change will get rid of the seemingly long streaks of bad "intensity cubes".
Major wisemanpsemc
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:59 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby carlpgoodrich on Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:45 pm

jakewilliams wrote:This makes it more random and makes it much less likely to duplicate a roll. Jake


No, this does not make it "more" random (random is a binary state, you either are or you aren't). In a list of random numbers, there is the same correlation (i.e. none) between the first number and the second as there is between the first and the third. Throwing away some numbers does not affect the randomness of the dice. The only advantage I can see is that the new way is slightly more efficient, but if that was really a problem that could easily be solved with a combination of a sudo-random number generator and the "true" random numbers from Random.org.

However, I do have some concern with the new changes (maybe I am not understanding Lack). It sounds to me like the same list of 50,000 numbers is used repeatedly. Is this within the same game or over all games? And how often does it get changed? My concern is that when you start repeating numbers you open yourself up to abuse. I doubt anyone would go through the trouble of mapping the list just to win at CC, but it is certainly doable.
Lieutenant carlpgoodrich
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby edwinissweet on Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:36 pm

lord voldemort wrote:*head explodes*


yea, my mind is pretty blown. Im not bright enough to understand how it works.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant edwinissweet
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: cozumel

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby Knight2254 on Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:54 pm

carlpgoodrich wrote:
jakewilliams wrote:This makes it more random and makes it much less likely to duplicate a roll. Jake


No, this does not make it "more" random (random is a binary state, you either are or you aren't). In a list of random numbers, there is the same correlation (i.e. none) between the first number and the second as there is between the first and the third. Throwing away some numbers does not affect the randomness of the dice. The only advantage I can see is that the new way is slightly more efficient, but if that was really a problem that could easily be solved with a combination of a sudo-random number generator and the "true" random numbers from Random.org.

However, I do have some concern with the new changes (maybe I am not understanding Lack). It sounds to me like the same list of 50,000 numbers is used repeatedly. Is this within the same game or over all games? And how often does it get changed? My concern is that when you start repeating numbers you open yourself up to abuse. I doubt anyone would go through the trouble of mapping the list just to win at CC, but it is certainly doable.


You could never do this as there are hundreds of attacks happening all at once.
Brigadier Knight2254
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:21 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby danfrank on Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:11 pm

I really do not understand this concept either. BUT.. Lets just do some simple math...


If the attacker has 3 dice and the defender 2 then at most there are 7776 different combinations... I come to this conclusion by mutliplying 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 .. So why is there a list of 50,000 thousand numbers which would logically suggest duplication ?


Also what is intensity level, and what determines this factor.. My belief is, this is a script that is written by said master and fused with random. org number generator. If this is the case then it is fair to say that certain members can have a more favorable equation in said script then others .
Last edited by danfrank on Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Corporal 1st Class danfrank
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:19 am

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby stahrgazer on Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:31 pm

danfrank wrote:I really do not understand this concept either. BUT.. Lets just do some simple math...
If the attacker has 3 dice and the defender 2 then at most there are 7776 different combinations... I come to this conclusion by mutliplying 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 .. So why is there a list of 50,000 thousand numbers which would logically suggest duplication ?


Agreed. The most random would be each roll generates one of 7776 combinations; the next number would pick from 7776 combinations.

However, the way they're doing it does help identify why people get series of really good rolls and series of really bad rolls; and for some, the 'randomness' doesn't necessarily equal out. Basically, the accusations that someone else got all the good dice can fairly true, if all the "good numbers" got used up before they reload the entire 50,000 combinations. :lol:
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby carlpgoodrich on Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:39 pm

Knight2254 wrote:
carlpgoodrich wrote:
jakewilliams wrote:This makes it more random and makes it much less likely to duplicate a roll. Jake


No, this does not make it "more" random (random is a binary state, you either are or you aren't). In a list of random numbers, there is the same correlation (i.e. none) between the first number and the second as there is between the first and the third. Throwing away some numbers does not affect the randomness of the dice. The only advantage I can see is that the new way is slightly more efficient, but if that was really a problem that could easily be solved with a combination of a sudo-random number generator and the "true" random numbers from Random.org.

However, I do have some concern with the new changes (maybe I am not understanding Lack). It sounds to me like the same list of 50,000 numbers is used repeatedly. Is this within the same game or over all games? And how often does it get changed? My concern is that when you start repeating numbers you open yourself up to abuse. I doubt anyone would go through the trouble of mapping the list just to win at CC, but it is certainly doable.


You could never do this as there are hundreds of attacks happening all at once.


Give me on the order of 50,000 rolls (they don't have to be consecutive) and a day or two to write the code and I'll do it (note to the mods, I'm not going to:) ).Like I said, I don't know how often the list of 50,000 numbers is replaced, so if its often this won't be relevant. But if it is not replaced regularly, it doesn't matter that there are hundreds of attacks happening all at once. All you need is a large number of samples from that set of 50,000. For example, if there are a larger than expected number of repeated numbers in the set than defending is slightly more favorable than it should be. There are tons of things like this that you can write a program to analyze, and if you have enough statistics it can tell you things like "be aggressive" or "don't be aggressive".
Lieutenant carlpgoodrich
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby hulmey on Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:19 pm

Dako wrote:Wow, that was rather quick. Too bad I don't have a stacking game to test out 10k attack.


true randomness cannot be judged with such a small amount. test a couple of million
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby jleonnn on Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:21 pm

big words!!!!! ahhhhh!!!!!!!!!!1
Major jleonnn
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:11 am
Location: The Communist Republic of Aoria

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby n00blet on Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:19 am

Awww mannnnn

Don't get me wrong, this sounds nice and all, but when I read the headline's title I was for a moment convinced that Lack had taken the "bunnies holding up placards" idea seriously...Needless to say, I was ecstatic.
User avatar
Captain n00blet
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:09 pm

Re: New "Intensity Cubes"

Postby MadagascarAdam on Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:08 am

Yeah, seriously, I'm wondering why they have to choose numbers consecutively in a sequence? Is it really that hard to get it to choose one random set from the sequence and then another random set from the sequence? Why does it have to choose the number in order?

Anyway, I'm definitely confused now. All along I thought my dice really were random, i.e. no one would ever know what was coming next. But now I'm thinking it is a bit rigged.

Then again, I don't know what kind of feats of processing strength are required to make this thing random, and I guess a list of numbers that were generated randomly is at least better than nothing. Can the starting point in the list not just be randomly selected for each individual set of rolls though? Why does it have to cycle through sequentially for the sum total of all ConquerClub rolls?
User avatar
Major MadagascarAdam
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: USA

Next

Return to Announcement Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users