notyou2 wrote:No choices here. They are all crooks, liars, and has-beens.
Know any good democrats?
I'm not sure Pawlenty is any of these things. You should take a look at what he's done in Minnesota.
Moderator: Community Team
notyou2 wrote:No choices here. They are all crooks, liars, and has-beens.
Know any good democrats?
saxitoxin wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:
Thanks for the blog post based soley on an alleged anonymous source. I think you should shut yourself down.
Uhhhh ... you started an anti-Obama thread and now, by just a few pages in, you've flipped and have started savaging anti-Obama comments?
You're like a newborn vampire in Stephanie Miller's uber-romantic series TWILIGHT! (Love it, gang!) Runnin' about, attacking anything regardless whether it's friend or foe, fighting whatever moves, suckin' on lotsa stuff ...
ViperOverLord wrote:
Wow. Now you're referencing Twilight.
ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
http://www.caivn.org/article/2010/07/26/dennis-kucinich-and-ron-paul-unite-bid-challenge-obamas-war-expansion-pakistan
For all you sell-outs - life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is fundamental. If you can't vote for a guy that believes in that then you're off. RP would not preserve the life part.
ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
notyou2 wrote:VO thanks for treating us to your vastly superior opinion. We should all just become sheeple to your intellect and ask you how we should vote. You are a breath of hot air.
Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
ViperOverLord wrote:Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
So all of terrorism lies within that one act? That's is the sum total of terrorism in your view? THAT is some "weak sauce", though it would explain a lot.
ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
So all of terrorism lies within that one act? That's is the sum total of terrorism in your view? THAT is some "weak sauce", though it would explain a lot.
You're presumption was that an American presence in Afghanistan fosters terrorism. I pointed out that they were not there when 911 hit. Try to keep up.
Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
So all of terrorism lies within that one act? That's is the sum total of terrorism in your view? THAT is some "weak sauce", though it would explain a lot.
Woodruff wrote:
All "presumption" here lies with you. Where did I mention Afghanistan? Try again...this time without the presumption. I'm about to lap you...that must be why you think I'm not keeping up.
Serious question here...how old are you? Yes, I do believe that's a relevant question.
ViperOverLord wrote:Can you debate my points rather than twist them. I will not be responding to you much longer if you insist on continually putting words in my mouth as a tactic to ignore what was just spoken.
ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
Snorri1234 wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
Wat?
ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:RP's winning the poll. That's just libs being mad that there is no Obama wins option lol. Again, RP has no spine. He'd be a great economic president but he'd just let the terrorism garden grow.
As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
So all of terrorism lies within that one act? That's is the sum total of terrorism in your view? THAT is some "weak sauce", though it would explain a lot.
Can you debate my points rather than twist them.
ViperOverLord wrote:I will not be responding to you much longer if you insist on continually putting words in my mouth as a tactic to ignore what was just spoken.
ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:
All "presumption" here lies with you. Where did I mention Afghanistan? Try again...this time without the presumption. I'm about to lap you...that must be why you think I'm not keeping up.
Serious question here...how old are you? Yes, I do believe that's a relevant question.
It's not a relevant question.
Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Woodruff wrote:As opposed to sowing the seeds of terrorism in the garden like we have been for quite some time now?
Excuse me but I don't remeber any American soldiers being in Afghanistan when 911 hit. That's just some weak sauce guy.
So all of terrorism lies within that one act? That's is the sum total of terrorism in your view? THAT is some "weak sauce", though it would explain a lot.
You're presumption was that an American presence in Afghanistan fosters terrorism. I pointed out that they were not there when 911 hit. Try to keep up.
All "presumption" here lies with you. Where did I mention Afghanistan? Try again...this time without the presumption. I'm about to lap you...that must be why you think I'm not keeping up.
ViperOverLord wrote:It's a shameless attempt to esteem your weak arguments as being superior. If you insist on making personal attacks rather than debating than I will have no problem parting the debate, knowing that you are not capable of sufficiently debating points.
Lootifer wrote:I earn well above average income for my area, i'm educated and I support left wing politics.
jbrettlip wrote:You live in New Zealand. We will call you when we need to make another Hobbit movie.
bradleybadly wrote:Anybody would be better than that assclown Obama
ViperOverLord wrote:Can you debate my points rather than twist them. I will not be responding to you much longer if you insist on continually putting words in my mouth as a tactic to ignore what was just spoken.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap, jonesthecurl, karel