California [Quenched]

[Industrial Helix]

Right now, my biggest concern is the insets fitting everything on the small map. But for now, this meets Melting Pot standards and will head on to gameplay.

[The Bison King]

Awesome! I actually just started playing the first analog game of this today. We didn't finish though... So far everything seems to be working out, though I definitely found a few things I already want to change. Mostly how territories are arranged in L.A, and Sierra Nevada, maybe a little bonus value tweaking here and there.

[The Bison King]

I'll update soon, I just haven't had as much time to work on this lately.

[The Bison King]

Click image to enlarge.

Click image to enlarge.

The big change on this one is that I rearranged Sierra Nevada's borders so that it only has 3 borders instead of 4. I also added all the names in. I should note that the territory "No Name" is in reference to a ghost town we found there literally called "No Name". That region of the state is pretty much defined by ghost towns so I thought it would be appropriate. It's either that or Lone Pine.

I still need to run the numbers through a bonus calculator but does anyone think that the central coast is worth too much?

[Victor Sullivan]

A few things:
1. The territory "No Name" is bad*ss. I hope you don't change the name
2. Central Coast should definitely stay +3, as it's equally as easy/hard to hold as Mojave.
3. The labels on the mini map are unnecessarily hard to read. Do you think you could increase the font size?
4. You think you could also have a different icon for cities? The black circles you have are rather bland and awkwardly stick out.

-Sully

[army of nobunaga]

i like this a lot.
Monterey for the win!

YOu may not want to, and I dont think you need it. But seems ppl think its too narrow or such- so you could do something like 13 colonies , some surfers out in the water, some islands ... i dunno.

but i rike it raggy

[The Bison King]

1. The territory "No Name" is bad*ss. I hope you don't change the name

2. Central Coast should definitely stay +3, as it's equally as easy/hard to hold as Mojave.

That raises the question, should Sierra nevada be +3 as well? it too is 5 terri 3 borders.

3. The labels on the mini map are unnecessarily hard to read. Do you think you could increase the font size?

I think I'm going to ditch the written legend in favor of a larger mini map that contains both the region names and bonus amounts.

4. You think you could also have a different icon for cities? The black circles you have are rather bland and awkwardly stick out.

I agree the black dots were just a place holder to show people where they would be. I'll find something better to do with them later in graphics.

i like this a lot.
Monterey for the win!

YOu may not want to, and I dont think you need it. But seems ppl think its too narrow or such- so you could do something like 13 colonies , some surfers out in the water, some islands ... i dunno.

Always good to hear from you AoN.

Yeah I've considered something like that, my version on that would be that adjacent port cities could attack each other. I would ad territories to Bay area and LA that would receive those attacks as well.

For example Eureka could attack San Francisco, San Francisco could attack Eureka and Montery, Monterey could attack San Francisco and Lompoc, Lompoc could attack Monterey and Beverely hills, Beverely hills could attack Montery and San diego, and San Diego could attack Beverely hills.

But like you said it may not be needed. I'm playing a game on this map wih friends right now and so far it hasn't seemed to be to big of an issue.

[army of nobunaga]

well, because you have 3 "highways" that run north to south, I dont think it will amount to an unfair choke. just my 2 cents. I like it. I like most maps that are simple and well done though.



IF there is a choke problem man.. I believe all you would have to do is move innyo forest off the edge, and make yosemite and kings canyon touch.. that will allow a little pressure to be taken off of a potential choke. I dont think i explained this well, bt i tried.

[Victor Sullivan]

2. Central Coast should definitely stay +3, as it's equally as easy/hard to hold as Mojave.

That raises the question, should Sierra nevada be +3 as well? it too is 5 terri 3 borders.

Yes. Now, if you implemented this (which I think would be cool)...

For example Eureka could attack San Francisco, San Francisco could attack Eureka and Montery, Monterey could attack San Francisco and Lompoc, Lompoc could attack Monterey and Beverely hills, Beverely hills could attack Montery and San diego, and San Diego could attack Beverely hills.

...you could make Central Coast +4, which would help create some diversity from all the 3's.

-Sully

[Industrial Helix]

You know, I'm not liking the whole lack of impassables or strategic territories. The only bonuses that are possible to take are Blue and maybe Purple... once a player grabs those its game over cause nobody will be able to grab a bonus to stop him. Maybe the cities would be an adequate counter weight, but I dunno. I'd like to see more strategic territories which serve as good areas to take and hold.

[The Bison King]

The only bonuses that are possible to take are Blue and maybe Purple... once a player grabs those its game over cause nobody will be able to grab a bonus to stop him.

That's not really true. The desert is easily acquired, so is Sierra Nevada. The Central valley makes up for the fact that it's hard to hold by having a high content of adjacent cities. I'm playing a game right now that hasn't ended yet, thus proving that it isn't over once someone takes either the blue or purple bonus. In fact it looks like it might go on for quite a while. Also in this game Northern California was the first bonus that was acquired, which is neither blue or purple (assuming you meant the coasts when you said that).

You know, I'm not liking the whole lack of impassables or strategic territories.

I'm not sure if you are missing the mountains but their are impassables, though I am considering extending them in a few places. And I would argue that their are strategic territories such as: Mojave Desert (touches every territory in it's bonus and borders 3 bonuses) Sacramento (Is a city, borders 4 bonuses and can be used as a choke point with Santa Rosa and Lake Tahoe) Redding (Is a city touches every territory in it's bonus) Fresno (easy expansion point for the Sierra Nevada bonus is a city and borders another city.) Modesto (is a choke point and a city that borders 2 other cities.)

[The Bison King]

though I am considering extending them in a few places

Specifically I'm considering extending the mountains from Monterey to block San Louis from attacking San jose, potentialy Oakland as well.

[porkenbeans]

I am having a little pick on the mountain ranges. Lake Tahoe, which is located in the corner, is where those mountains should start. They run from there to the south.

Click image to enlarge.

Also the territ designations for LA are not quite right. I will post something on this a little later.

[Industrial Helix]

Well, no I see the mountains, its just that I think there ought to be more to lock things up and make some choke points. What about that lake as an impassable around Solano?

Furthermore, its awesome that you can test this stuff out.

[MrBenn]

I hate to say it, but I really don;t think the visual style fits the theme of the map at all... while it worked for Thyseneal, I don't know how well it works here.