Moderator: Tournament Directors
qwert wrote:well i find tournament handbook,and only what its required it number of players
""All tournaments must have at least the following amount of participants:
1v1 and Singles Tournaments: 16 players
Team Tournaments: 8 teams""
These mean that tournament organiser,can create tournament with only 3 games.
Two group of 8-each group play 1 game,and winner of bouth group play final 1vs1 game-tournament are over and TO and Winner get medals- and only what its need-create 3 tourny game.
Well i need to try create these tournament, its time that i also get easy medal,like all ready people get medals for that.
qwert wrote:What? So you want to say,that i can create tournament,and i only need to apply two rules?
1.minimum 16 players
2.Winner of Tournament need to have minimum 3 game played???
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If these correct, then i will create tournament, like example to see what its wrong.
DJ Teflon all ready find big hole in tournament rules, but its look that need time to all TD open hes eyes to see where is problem.
qwert wrote:so total 5 games in one tournament for you its ok? And for you,these tournament deserve to be awarded with medals???
qwert wrote:I just realised that tournament requirement for organisin valid tournament its so low,that you can create very fast 10 to 100 tournament in almost one month.
Organiser get medal for creating 7 tournament games,and winner get medal for play 3 tournament games- these is what i call circus of Tournament,and i dont know how its these aloved to hepend-where its real rules here- ridiculos.
In these way( who its look that its acepted by tournament mods),everybody can get medal,very easy,and very fast.
qwert wrote:good that TD notice that,its abouth time to bring some real tournament minimum requirement ,so that any future tournament,look to real tournament, not some kind of joke.
by jrh_cardinal » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:03 am
qwert, please don't. You were around when all this happened last year, no one wants to start it again. A lot of people like to play 16 player 1v1 bracket tourneys, that's why 16 player tourneys was kept. NS raised it to a minimum 3 games played to try to raise the bar, so that people went beyond the absolute easiest tourneys they could possibly come up with.
In my mind the rules are in place to make the smallest tourneys 16 player 1v1 brackets or 8 team brackets. Since there are so many different game types on CC which these rules were not specifically made for, yes, there are loopholes. However, the only thing you will accomplish by exposing the loopholes publicly like you are suggesting is forcing NS and the other TD's to make the rules stricter to close the loopholes. This makes NS look like the bad guy, again, and more importantly takes away a very popular, very legal brand of tournament and quite possibly makes CC lose some tourney players who like tourneys like that, all because you can't follow the "spirit" of the law.
greenoaks wrote:what qwert is doing is setting up a tournament where the players still need to win the minimum 3 games but the TO only needs to create 4 games (5 max). the tournament seems to be about him getting an easy medal, not the players.
put a minimum numbers of games created for the TO to get a medal and these shenanigans will cease.
Night Strike wrote:greenoaks wrote:what qwert is doing is setting up a tournament where the players still need to win the minimum 3 games but the TO only needs to create 4 games (5 max). the tournament seems to be about him getting an easy medal, not the players.
put a minimum numbers of games created for the TO to get a medal and these shenanigans will cease.
There wasn't a problem until qwert decided to make it a problem. If he wasn't trying to make these types of tournaments, no one would be doing it. He's the one creating a problem that no one else had tried to exploit before.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users